The Impact of COVID Vaccination on Symptoms of Long COVID: An International Survey of People with Lived Experience of Long COVID
Open accessAbstract
Long COVID is a multi-system syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 infection with persistent symptoms of at least 4 weeks, and frequently for several months. It has been suggested that there may be an autoimmune component. There has been an understandable caution amongst some people experiencing long COVID that, by boosting their immune response, a COVID vaccine may exacerbate their symptoms. We aimed to survey people living with long COVID, evaluating the impact of their first COVID vaccination on their symptoms. Methods: Patients with long COVID were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire through postings on social media and direct mailing from support groups. Basic demographics, range and severity of long COVID symptoms, before and after their vaccine, were surveyed. Results: 900 people participated in the questionnaire, of whom 45 had pre-existing myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) but no evidence of COVID infection, and a further 43 did not complete the survey in full. The demographics and symptomology of the remaining 812 people were similar to those recorded by the UK Office of National Statistics. Following vaccination, 57.9% of participants reported improvements in symptoms, 17.9% reported deterioration and the remainder no change. There was considerable individual variation in responses. Larger improvements in symptom severity scores were seen in those receiving the mRNA vaccines compared to adenoviral vector vaccines. Conclusions: Our survey suggests COVID-19 vaccination may improve long COVID patients, on average. The observational nature of the survey limits drawing direct causal inference, but requires validation with a randomised controlled trial.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More than half of the symptomatic worsening after vaccination resolved within 3-7 days.
“One study showed that more than half of the symptomatic worsening after vaccination resolved within 3-7 days [27].”
From Protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination against long COVID syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
The Results (p. 4) say that exactly 50% of participants whose symptoms worsened had recovered by the survey, and that the median time to improvement was 3–7 days. The Conclusions (p. 9) say symptoms returned to baseline in over half of participants, but do not say that over half recovered within 3–7 days. The claim combines those two findings into a proportion and timeframe the paper does not report. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSymptomatic improvement of long COVID after vaccination might be explained by the additional antibody production due to vaccination.
“Symptomatic improvement of long COVID after vaccination might be explained by the additional antibody production due to vaccination [27].”
From Protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination against long COVID syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
The Hypothesised Mechanisms section (p. 8) suggests that vaccination might boost the immune system and rectify low IgM and IgG3 levels in people with long COVID. It does not specifically identify additional antibody production as the explanation for symptom improvement, and cautions that the observational data cannot establish a mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThese deteriorations may simply be temporary reactions rather than long COVID exacerbations.
“these deteriorations may simply be temporary reactions rather than long COVID exacerbations [13,27].”
From Protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination against long COVID syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 22 · Cited by 122
- Authors
- Strain, W. D., Sherwood, O., Banerjee, A., Van der Togt, V., Hishmeh, L., & Rossman, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- LongCovidSOS, Patient Advocacy Group, Surrey, UK
- University College London (GB)
- Research-Aid Networks, Chicago, IL 60605, USA
- University of Kent (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Strain, William David
- Venue
- Vaccines
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-04-21
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 652
- ISSN
- 2076-393X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9146071
- OpenAlex
- W4225321109
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 15.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vaccines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (COV-LT2-0043)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Keywords
- long COVID, COVID-19 vaccination, symptom improvement, symptom severity, mRNA vaccines, adenovirus vector vaccine, autoimmune hypothesis, lived experience, chronic fatigue syndrome, vaccine safety concerns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review