The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IntegralVac: A Machine Learning-Based Comprehensive Multivalent Epitope Vaccine Design Method
Open accessAbstract
In the growing field of vaccine design for COVID and cancer research, it is essential to predict accurate peptide binding affinity and immunogenicity. We developed a comprehensive machine learning method, ‘IntegralVac,’ by integrating three existing deep learning tools: DeepVacPred, MHCSeqNet, and HemoPI. IntegralVac makes predictions for single and multivalent cancer and COVID-19 epitopes without manually selecting epitope prediction possibilities. We performed several rounds of optimization before integration, then re-trained IntegralVac for multiple datasets. We validated the IntegralVac with 4500 human cancer MHC I peptides obtained from the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) and with cancer and COVID epitopes previously selected in our laboratory. The other data referenced from existing deep learning tools served as a positive control to ensure successful prediction was possible. As evidenced by increased accuracy and AUC, IntegralVac improved the prediction rate of top-ranked epitopes. We also examined the compatibility between other servers’ clinical checkpoint filters and IntegralVac. This was to ensure that the other servers had a means for predicting additional checkpoint filters that we wanted to implement in IntegralVac. The clinical checkpoint filters, including allergenicity, antigenicity, and toxicity, were used as additional predictors to improve IntegralVac’s prediction accuracy. We generated immunogenicity scores by cross-comparing sequence inputs with each other and determining the overlap between each individual peptide sequence. The IntegralVac increased the immunogenicity prediction accuracy to 90.1% AUC and the binding affinity accuracy to 95.4% compared to the control NetMHCPan server. The IntegralVac opens new avenues for future in silico methods, by building upon established models for continued prediction accuracy improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2
Gao, Q., Bao, L., Mao, H., Wang, L., Xu, K., Yang, M., Li, Y., Zhu, L., Wang, N., Lv, Z., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc1932 · Cited by 1,434
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Huang, 2020, Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China, Lancet, 395, 497, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Acar, 2020, An insight into the epitope-based peptide vaccine design strategy and studies against COVID-19, Turk. J. Biol., 44, 215, 10.3906/biy-2006-1 · DOI
- Zhang, 2020, Epidemiological, clinical characteristics of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection with abnormal imaging findings, Int. J. Infect. Dis., 94, 81, 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.040 · DOI
- Acharya, 2010, Recent advances in ligand-based drug design: Relevance and utility of the conformationally sampled pharmacophore approach, Curr. Comput. Aided-Drug Des., 7, 10, 10.2174/157340911793743547 · DOI
- Nicosia, G., Cutello, V., Bentley, P.J., and Timis, J. (2004). BcePred: Prediction of Continuous B-Cell Epitopes in Antigenic Sequences Using Physico-chemical Properties, Springer. ICARIS 2004, LNCS 3239.
- Yang, 2021, An in silico deep learning approach to multi-epitope vaccine design: A SARS-CoV-2 case study, Sci. Rep., 11, 3238, 10.1038/s41598-021-81749-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Phloyphisut, P., Pornputtapong, N., Sriswasdi, S., and Chuangsuwanich, E. (2019). MHCSeqNet: A deep neural network model for universal MHC binding prediction. BMC Bioinform., 20. · DOI
- Plisson, 2020, Machine learning-guided discovery and design of non-hemolytic peptides, Sci. Rep., 10, 16581, 10.1038/s41598-020-73644-6 · DOI
- Savsani, K., Jabbour, G., and Dakshanamurthy, S. (2022). A New Epitope Selection Method: Application to Design a Multi-Valent Epitope Vaccine Targeting HRAS Oncogene in Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Vaccines., 10. · DOI
- Parn, S., Jabbour, G., Nguyenkhoa, V., and Dakshanamurthy, S. (2021). Design of Peptide Vaccine for COVID19: CD8+ and CD4+ T cell epitopes from SARS-CoV-2 open-reading-frame protein variants. BioRxiv, 1–38. · DOI
- Zeng, S., Pöttler, M., Lan, B., Grützmann, R., Pilarsky, C., and Yang, H. (2019). Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20. · DOI
- Wu, 2020, Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: A modelling study, Lancet, 395, 689, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Vita, 2015, The immune epitope database (IEDB) 3.0, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 405, 10.1093/nar/gku938 · DOI
- Jabbour, G., Rego, S., Nguyenkhoa, V., and Dakshanamurthy, S. (2021). Design of T-cell epitope-based vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2 targeting nucleocapsid and spike protein escape variants. BioRxiv, 1–31. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Suri, S., & Dakshanamurthy, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dakshanamurthy, Sivanesan
- Venue
- Vaccines
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-10-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1678
- ISSN
- 2076-393X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9611587
- OpenAlex
- W4304190193
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vaccines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- epitope vaccine design, multivalent vaccine, immunogenicity prediction, allergenicity, antigenicity, toxicity, in silico vaccine design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review