Microbiome as a Tool to Monitor Aquarium Systems
Open accessAbstract
The bacterial microbiome in aquaria plays an essential role in system stability by metabolizing toxic compounds like ammonia. This study monitored microbiome changes in seven zoo aquatic systems during their first year to assess responses to external influences. Over one year (October 2021–October 2022), water and swab samples were collected from one seawater tank and six filtration systems at regular intervals. Bacterial cultivation included total bacterial counts. Metagenomic analysis was performed on samples corresponding to environmental events using Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Taxonomical analysis at the phylum and genus levels used EPI2ME software. Diversity analyses and statistical tests were performed using R. Total bacterial counts increased steadily after inoculation and stabilized by the end of the collection period. Diversity analysis revealed significant differences within and between freshwater and saltwater tanks. Each aquarium exhibited a distinct bacterial community with frequent compositional changes. Despite environmental conditions and maintenance interventions and resulting disturbances that affected the microbiome, the overall nitrifying capacity remained unaffected. Nitrifying taxa emerged as potential indicators for environmental effects. Combined with investigations of ecological function, next-generation sequencing could facilitate the development of aquarium management protocols, ultimately improving fish welfare.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Elmagzoub, W. A., Weidmann, M., Elnaiem, M. H. E., Dennig, A., Waller, U., Bernhard, A., Junhold, J., Abd El Wahed, A., Truyen, U., & Ceruti, A.
- Affiliations
- Leipzig University (DE)
- Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE)
- University of Khartoum (SD)
- Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft des Saarlandes (DE)
- Zoo Leipzig, Pfaffendorfer Str. 29, 04105 Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Corresponding author
- Ceruti, Arianna
- ORCID
- Venue
- Veterinary Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2026-01-28
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125
- ISSN
- 2306-7381 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12945128
- OpenAlex
- W7125895172
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Veterinary Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Freundeskreis Tiermedizin der Veterinärmedizinischen Fakultät Leipzig e.V.
- Open Access Publishing Fund of Leipzig University
- German Research Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Keywords
- bacterial community composition, nitrification, ammonia removal, filtration systems, microbial diversity, environmental disturbance, fish welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review