Cited by 20Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesUrban Heat Island Mitigation

Site-Scale Integrated Decision Support Tool (i-DSTss) for Stormwater Management

Open access
Shojaeizadeh, Ali, Geza, Mengistu, McCray, John, Hogue, Terri S.·2019·Water

Abstract

A site-scale integrated decision support tool (i-DSTss) is developed for selection and sizing of stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs). The tool has several component modules—hydrology, BMP selection, BMP sizing, and life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA)—integrated into a single platform. The hydrology module predicts runoff from small catchment on event and continuous basis using the Green-Ampt and Curve Number methods. The module predicted runoff from a small residential area and a parking lot with R2 value of 0.77 and 0.74, respectively. The BMP selection module recommends a BMP type appropriate for a site based on economic, technical, social and environmental criteria using a multi-criteria optimization approach. The BMP sizing module includes sizing options for green roofs, infiltration-based BMPs, and storage-based BMPs. A mass balance approach is implemented for all types of BMPs. The tool predicted outflow rates from a permeable pavement with R2 value of 0.89. A cost module is included where capital, operation and maintenance, and rehabilitation costs are estimated based on BMP size obtained from the sizing module. The i-DSTss is built on an accessible platform (Microsoft Excel VBA) and can be operated with a basic skillset. The i-DSTss is intended for designers, regulators, and municipalities for quick analysis of scenarios involving interaction among several factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/w11102022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BMP technologies have been developed to manage urban runoff and improve water quality, and LID bioretention cells are one BMP found to be an effective means of reducing heavy metals found in runoff.

    “Best management practice (BMP) technologies have been developed to manage urban runoff and improve water quality [12], and lowimpact development (LID) bioretention cells are one BMP found to be an effective means of reducing heavy metals found in runoff [13].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 51 · Cited by 20

Authors
Shojaeizadeh, A., Geza, M., McCray, J., & Hogue, T. S.
Affiliations
  • South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US)
  • Colorado School of Mines (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shojaeizadeh, Ali
  • Geza, Mengistu
Venue
Water
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-09-28
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
2022
ISSN
2073-4441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975524554
Cited by
20
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-G2015ORD-D1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Keywords
stormwater management, best management practices, life cycle cost analysis, multi-criteria decision making, runoff prediction, curve number method, green roofs, permeable pavement, mass balance, residential catchments, parking lots, cost estimation, decision support system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review