The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Worldwide Regulations and Guidelines for Agricultural Water Reuse: A Critical Review
Open accessAbstract
Water reuse is gaining momentum as a beneficial practice to address the water crisis, especially in the agricultural sector as the largest water consumer worldwide. With recent advancements in wastewater treatment technologies, it is possible to produce almost any water quality. However, the main human and environmental concerns are still to determine what constituents must be removed and to what extent. The main objectives of this study were to compile, evaluate, and compare the current agricultural water reuse regulations and guidelines worldwide, and identify the gaps. In total, 70 regulations and guidelines, including Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), World Health Organization (WHO), the United States (state by state), European Commission, Canada (all provinces), Australia, Mexico, Iran, Egypt, Tunisia, Jordan, Palestine, Oman, China, Kuwait, Israel, Saudi Arabia, France, Cyprus, Spain, Greece, Portugal, and Italy were investigated in this study. These regulations and guidelines were examined to compile a comprehensive database, including all of the water quality monitoring parameters, and necessary treatment processes. In summary, results showed that the regulations and guidelines are mainly human-health centered, insufficient regarding some of the potentially dangerous pollutants such as emerging constituents, and with large discrepancies when compared with each other. In addition, some of the important water quality parameters such as some of the pathogens, heavy metals, and salinity are only included in a small group of regulations and guidelines investigated in this study. Finally, specific treatment processes have been only mentioned in some of the regulations and guidelines, and with high levels of discrepancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative physiology of salt and water stress
Munns, R. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x · Cited by 6,331
Ecotoxicology of human pharmaceuticals
Fent, K., Weston, A. A., & Caminada, D. (2006) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.09.009 · Cited by 3,223
Rizzo, L., Manaia, C., Merlin, C., Schwartz, T., Dagot, C., Ploy, M. C., Michael, I., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.032 · Cited by 2,493
Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen
Kidd, K. A., Blanchfield, P. J., Mills, K. H., Palace, V. P., Evans, R. E., Lazorchak, J. M., & Flick, R. W. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609568104 · Cited by 2,094
The United Nations World Water Development Report 2019: Leaving No One Behind
United Nations Educational, S. A. C. O. (2019) · The United Nations World Water Development Report · doi:10.18356/0d8fe383-en · Cited by 895
Nash, J. P., Kime, D. E., Van der Ven, L. T. M., Wester, P. W., Brion, F., Maack, G., Stahlschmidt-Allner, P., & Tyler, C. R. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7209 · Cited by 664
Qadir, M., Sharma, B. R., Bruggeman, A., Choukr-Allah, R., & Karajeh, F. (2007) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2006.03.018 · Cited by 569
Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture: A Review about Its Limitations and Benefits
Jaramillo, M., & Restrepo, I. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101734 · Cited by 521
Novo, A., André, S., Viana, P., Nunes, O. C., & Manaia, C. M. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.010 · Cited by 460
The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment
Fatta-Kassinos, D., Kalavrouziotis, I. K., Koukoulakis, P. H., & Vasquez, M. I. (2011) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.036 · Cited by 450
Cited by
Heavy Metal Water Pollution: A Fresh Look about Hazards, Novel and Conventional Remediation Methods
Zamora-Ledezma, C., Negrete-Bolagay, D., Figueroa, F., Zamora-Ledezma, E., Ni, M., Alexis, F., & Guerrero, V. H. (2021) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2021.101504 · Cited by 1,246
Yaqoubnejad, P., Rad, H. A., & Taghavijeloudar, M. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113482 · Cited by 103
Thilmany, E. A., Newton, S., Goeringer, P., & Rosenberg Goldstein, R. E. (2024) · Water · doi:10.3390/w16020334 · Cited by 12
Water reuse in the frame of circular economy
Wanner, J., Srb, M., & Beneš, O. (2023) · Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99920-5.00014-7 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Shoushtarian, F., & Negahban-Azar, M.
- Venue
- Water
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-03-29
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 971
- ISSN
- 2073-4441 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3013911488
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 17.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Worldwide Regulations and Guidelines for Agricultural Water Reuse: A Critical Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/w12040971
- The paper
- Shoushtarian, F., & Negahban-Azar, M. (2020). Worldwide Regulations and Guidelines for Agricultural Water Reuse: A Critical Review. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12040971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.