Cited by 14Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyFish Ecology and Management Studies

Evaluation on the Restoration Effects in the River Restoration Projects Practiced in South Korea

Open access
An, Ji Hong, Lim, Bong Soon, Seol, Jaewon, Kim, A Reum, Lim, Chi Hong, Moon, Jeong Sook, Lee, Chang Seok·2022·Water

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of the restoration of rivers carried out by the central government on streams located in major cities in South Korea. The effects of the restoration were evaluated based on the morphological and ecological characteristics, species composition and richness of vegetation, and a Riparian Vegetation Index of the restored streams. The naturalness of the streams, based on both the morphological and ecological characteristics, as well as the Riparian Vegetation Index of the restored streams was significantly lower than that of the reference rivers. The vegetation profiles of the restored streams did not reflect the flooding regimen of the river. Furthermore, the herbaceous plants found on the streambanks give way to shrubs and then to tree-dominated vegetation, respectively. The species composition of the vegetation in the restored streams showed a significant difference from that of the reference streams and this difference was particularly more significant with regards to the herbaceous plant-dominated vegetation types. The species richness of the restored streams showed a difference among the different streams but was lower than that of the reference streams. The ratio of exotic and gardening plants occupied in the species composition of the restored streams tended to be higher than that in the reference streams. Considering the above results, the restoration effects were usually low in the restored streams. Accordingly, an active adaptive management plan was recommended to improve those problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/w14172739

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The S1 strategy signifies an elevated erosion-risk profile, representing a trade-off where short-term hydraulic gains may be negated by long-term geomorphic degradation under repeated climate-driven flooding.

    “This strategy signifies an elevated erosion-risk profile, representing a trade-off where shortterm hydraulic gains may be negated by long-term geomorphic degradation under repeated climate-driven flooding 42 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
An, J. H., Lim, B. S., Seol, J., Kim, A. R., Lim, C. H., Moon, J. S., & Lee, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Korea National Baekdudaegan Aboretum, Bonghwa 36209, Korea
  • Seoul Women's University (KR)
  • National Institute of Forestry Science (KR)
  • National Institute of Ecology (KR)
  • National Institute of Environmental Research (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Chang Seok
Venue
Water
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-09-02
Volume
14
Issue
17
Pages
2739
ISSN
2073-4441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295095537
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Korea Ministry of Environment (2022003630002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
river restoration, urban rivers, restoration effectiveness, riparian vegetation, naturalness, vegetation species composition, species richness, non-native plants, adaptive management, South Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review