Cited by 11Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsHydrological Forecasting Using AIWater Quality Monitoring Technologies

Research on the development and application of a deep learning model for effective management and response to harmful algal blooms

Open access
Kim, Jungwook, Kim, Hongtae, Kim, Kyunghyun, Ahn, Jung Min·2023·Water

Abstract

Harmful algal blooms (HABs) caused by harmful cyanobacteria adversely impact the water quality in aquatic ecosystems and burden socioecological systems that are based on water utilization. Currently, Korea uses the Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code-National Institute of Environmental Research (EFDC-NIER) model to predict algae conditions and respond to algal blooms through the HAB alert system. This study aimed to establish an additional deep learning model to effectively respond to algal blooms. The prediction model is based on a deep neural network (DNN), which is a type of artificial neural network widely used for HAB prediction. By applying the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) to resolve the imbalance in the data, the DNN model showed improved performance during validation for predicting the number of cyanobacteria cells. The R-squared increased from 0.7 to 0.78, MAE decreased from 0.7 to 0.6, and RMSE decreased from 0.9 to 0.7, indicating an enhancement in the model’s performance. Furthermore, regarding the HAB alert levels, the R-squared increased from 0.18 to 0.79, MAE decreased from 0.2 to 0.1, and RMSE decreased from 0.3 to 0.2, indicating improved performance as well. According to the results, the constructed data-based model reasonably predicted algae conditions in the summer when algal bloom-induced damage occurs and accurately predicted the HAB alert levels for immediate decision-making. The main objective of this study was to develop a new technology for predicting and managing HABs in river environments, aiming for a sustainable future for the aquatic ecosystem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/w15122293

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ontology support is presently being used in a very small number of commercial systems.

    “These issues help articulate why ontology support is presently being used in a very small number of commercial systems [42 -44].”

    From Reinvigorating algal cultivation for biomass production with digital twin technology - a smart sustainable infrastructure (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction discusses deep-learning models for environmental prediction, while Appendix A reports harmful-algal-bloom alert predictions; neither addresses ontology support in commercial systems. Searches for “ontology support commercial systems” and “ontology commercial adoption knowledge representation” found no passage addressing the claim. The indexed passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 11

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kleinman, P.; Sharpley, A. Eutrophication of Lakes and Rivers. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences; Wiley Online Library, John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Lek, S.; Park, Y.S. Artificial Neural Network. In Encyclopedia of Ecology; Academic Press, Elservier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 237-245. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Recknagel, F., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Kingma, D.P.; Ba, J.L. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA, USA, 7-9 May 2015.

Authors
Kim, J., Kim, H., Kim, K., & Ahn, J. M.
Affiliations
National Institute of Environmental Research (KR)
Corresponding author
Ahn, Jung Min
Venue
Water
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-06-19
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
2293
ISSN
2073-4441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381337055
Cited by
11
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (NIER-2023-01-01-097)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Keywords
harmful algal blooms, cyanobacteria, deep neural network, SMOTE, class imbalance, river water quality, algal bloom management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review