Changes in Nitrification Kinetics and Diversity of Canonical Nitrifiers and Comammox Bacteria in a Moving Bed Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor—A Long-Term Study
Open accessAbstract
A lab-scale pure moving bed sequencing batch biofilm reactor (MBSBBR) was employed to investigate changes in nitrification kinetics and microbial diversity. The MBSBBR operated under different aeration strategies (defined by the ratio of the duration of the subphases with (t1) and without (t2) aeration (R = t2/t1)) − continuous (R = 0) and intermittent (with constant time of non-aerated subphases (t2 = 10 min) and variable duration of subphases with aeration (t1 = 40 min–R = 1/4, t1 = 30 min–R = 1/3, t1 = 20 min–R = 1/2) and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations (6 mg/L; 3.5 mg/L). Moreover, the reactor’s organic (OLR) and nitrogen (NLR) loading rates were changed in the following ranges: OLR—537–402 gCOD/m3·d, NLR—64–48 gN/m3·d. The obtained results showed that, irrespective of changes introduced in particular series, a highly effective nitrification process (93.36 ± 2.13%) was achieved. The activity of bacteria capable of oxidizing ammonia nitrogen changed differently from that of bacteria capable of oxidizing nitrites (NOB). An increase in R was the primary factor changing the activity of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms. NOB activity was affected only by the reduction of OLR and NLR. NOB were the predominant bacterial group, consistent with the kinetics studies. A DO decrease caused an increase in the abundance of AOB, NOB, and Comammox bacteria. Comammox bacteria were the most abundant at R = 1/2 and DO = 3.5 mg/L.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Zajac, O., Zubrowska-Sudol, M., Godzieba, M., & Ciesielski, S.
- Affiliations
- Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
- Department of Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment, Faculty of Building Services, Hydro and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 20, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland
- University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
- Department of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Sloneczna 45G, 10-709 Olsztyn, Poland
- Venue
- Water
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-02-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 534
- ISSN
- 2073-4441 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391644091
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2024-02-08)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Water (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Polish National Science Center (UMO-2017/27/B/NZ9/01039)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Keywords
- nitrification kinetics, comammox bacteria, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, aeration strategy, dissolved oxygen, organic loading rate, nitrogen loading rate, microbial community diversity, ammonia oxidation, nitrite oxidation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review