The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Triadic communication in the primary care paediatric consultation: a review of the literature
Open accessAbstract
Background Children aged 6-12 years are usually seen in primary care with an adult carer. It is a government and professional priority for doctors to try and involve these children in their medical consultations. Aim To ascertain the evidence available on the amount and type of involvement that children in the 6-12 year age group have in their primary care consultations when the consultation was held with a child, a GP, and an adult. Design of the study Literature review. Method Data sources included MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC, The Cochrane library, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Wilson's Social Science abstracts, hand searching for references, and contact with authors. Results Twenty-one studies were selected for inclusion in the study. Children were found to have little quantitative involvement in their own consultations. They may take part during information gathering but are unlikely to participate in the treatment planning and discussion parts of the consultation. Conclusion Children in the 6-12 year age group have little meaningful involvement in their consultations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Communication in paediatrics is generally triadic and should be addressed towards both the parents and the child with language appropriate to the age of the child (142).”
From ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease. (2022) · cites this paper as [142]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease.
Mearin, M. L., Agardh, D., Antunes, H., Al‐toma, A., Auricchio, R., Castillejo, G., Catassi, C., Ciacci, C., Discepolo, V., Dolinsek, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000003540 · Cited by 186
Seo, W., Buyuktur, A. G., Verma, S., Kim, H., Choi, S. W., Sedig, L., & Park, S. Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445120 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Cahill, P., & Papageorgiou, A.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- ORCID
- Papageorgiou, Alexia
- Venue
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 544
- Pages
- 904-911
- ISSN
- 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-5242
- PMC
- PMC2169315
- OpenAlex
- W2047411811
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Keywords
- triadic communication, pediatric consultation, primary care, children aged 6-12, physician-patient communication, information gathering, treatment planning, parental involvement, child-centered care
- MeSH terms
- Child, Communication, Family Practice, Humans, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Triadic communication in the primary care paediatric consultation: a review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3399/096016407782317892
- The paper
- Cahill, P., & Papageorgiou, A. (2007). Triadic communication in the primary care paediatric consultation: a review of the literature. British Journal of General Practice. https://doi.org/10.3399/096016407782317892