Cited by 66Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Women’s experiences of referral to a domestic violence advocate in UK primary care settings: a service-user collaborative study

Open access
Malpass, Alice, Sales, Kim, Johnson, Medina, Howell, Annie, Agnew-Davies, Roxane, Feder, Gene·2014·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women experiencing domestic violence and abuse (DVA) are more likely to be in touch with health services than any other agency, yet doctors and nurses rarely ask about abuse, often failing to identify signs of DVA in their patients. AIM: To understand women's experience of disclosure of DVA in primary care settings and subsequent referral to a DVA advocate in the context of a DVA training and support programme for primary care clinicians: Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS). DESIGN AND SETTING: A service-user collaborative study using a qualitative study design. Recruitment was from across IRIS trial settings in Bristol and Hackney, London. METHOD: Twelve women who had been referred to one of two specialist DVA advocates (based at specialist DVA agencies) were recruited by a GP taking part in IRIS. Women were interviewed by a survivor of DVA and interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was thematic using constant comparison. RESULTS: GPs and nurses can play an important role in identifying women experiencing DVA and referring them to DVA specialist agencies. GPs may also have an important role to play in helping women maintain any changes they make as a result of referral to an advocate, by asking about DVA in subsequent consultations. CONCLUSION: A short time interval between a primary care referral and initial contact with an advocate was valued by some women. For the initial contact with an advocate to happen as soon as possible after a primary care referral has been made, a close working relationship between primary care and the third sector needs to be cultivated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp14x677527

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 66

Authors
Malpass, A., Sales, K., Johnson, M., Howell, A., Agnew-Davies, R., & Feder, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Institute for Research in Schools (GB)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2014-02-24
Volume
64
Issue
620
Pages
e151-e158
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W2044486437
Cited by
66
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
domestic violence, domestic violence advocates, primary care referral, disclosure of abuse, women's experiences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cooperative Behavior, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Advocacy, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Truth Disclosure, Violence, Women's Health, Domestic Violence, Qualitative Research, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review