Women’s experiences of referral to a domestic violence advocate in UK primary care settings: a service-user collaborative study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Women experiencing domestic violence and abuse (DVA) are more likely to be in touch with health services than any other agency, yet doctors and nurses rarely ask about abuse, often failing to identify signs of DVA in their patients. AIM: To understand women's experience of disclosure of DVA in primary care settings and subsequent referral to a DVA advocate in the context of a DVA training and support programme for primary care clinicians: Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS). DESIGN AND SETTING: A service-user collaborative study using a qualitative study design. Recruitment was from across IRIS trial settings in Bristol and Hackney, London. METHOD: Twelve women who had been referred to one of two specialist DVA advocates (based at specialist DVA agencies) were recruited by a GP taking part in IRIS. Women were interviewed by a survivor of DVA and interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was thematic using constant comparison. RESULTS: GPs and nurses can play an important role in identifying women experiencing DVA and referring them to DVA specialist agencies. GPs may also have an important role to play in helping women maintain any changes they make as a result of referral to an advocate, by asking about DVA in subsequent consultations. CONCLUSION: A short time interval between a primary care referral and initial contact with an advocate was valued by some women. For the initial contact with an advocate to happen as soon as possible after a primary care referral has been made, a close working relationship between primary care and the third sector needs to be cultivated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disclosure without appropriate referral may leave women vulnerable.
“However, disclosure without appropriate referral may leave women vulnerable 20,21”
From Help‐seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Malpass, A., Sales, K., Johnson, M., Howell, A., Agnew-Davies, R., & Feder, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Institute for Research in Schools (GB)
- Venue
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2014-02-24
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 620
- Pages
- e151-e158
- ISSN
- 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-5242
- PMC
- PMC3933838
- OpenAlex
- W2044486437
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- domestic violence, domestic violence advocates, primary care referral, disclosure of abuse, women's experiences
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cooperative Behavior, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Advocacy, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Truth Disclosure, Violence, Women's Health, Domestic Violence, Qualitative Research, General Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review