Cited by 7Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

Implementing competency based admissions at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Open access
Kerrigan, Noreen, Akabas, Myles H., Betzler, Thomas F., Castaldi, Maria, Kelly, Mary S., Levy, Adam S., Reichgott, Michael J., Ruberman, Louise +1 more·2016·Medical Education Online

Abstract

The Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Einstein) was founded in 1955 during an era of limited access to medical school for women, racial minorities, and many religious and ethnic groups. Located in the Bronx, NY, Einstein seeks to educate physicians in an environment of state-of-the-art scientific inquiry while simultaneously fulfilling a deep commitment to serve its community by providing the highest quality clinical care. A founding principle of Einstein, the basis upon which Professor Einstein agreed to allow the use of his name, was that admission to the student body would be based entirely on merit. To accomplish this, Einstein has long used a 'holistic' approach to the evaluation of its applicants, actively seeking a diverse student body. More recently, in order to improve its ability to identify students with the potential to be outstanding physicians, who will both advance medical knowledge and serve the pressing health needs of a diverse community, the Committee on Admissions reexamined and restructured the requirements for admission. These have now been categorized as four 'Admissions Competencies' that an applicant must demonstrate. They include: 1) cocurricular activities and relevant experiences; 2) communication skills; 3) personal and professional development; and 4) knowledge. The purpose of this article is to describe the process that resulted in the introduction and implementation of this competency based approach to the admission process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/meo.v21.30000

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BxCHL program enhances competency-based skills identified by the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and most medical schools' holistic admission process, including interpersonal and communication skills, knowledge of health care systems, participation in scholarly inquiry, cultural competency, service orientation, and teamwork.

    “The program enhances competency-based skills identified by the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and most medical schools' holistic admission process, including interpersonal and communication skills, knowledge of health care systems, participation in scholarly inquiry, cultural competency, service orientation, and teamwork.18,19”

    From Impact of the Bronx Community Health Leaders Program for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Prehealth Students (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

    The paper’s admissions-competencies discussion (section labeled Abstract; no page supplied) identifies communication, interpersonal skills, cultural sensitivity, service, teamwork, and research experience as relevant to Einstein’s holistic admissions approach. It does not evaluate whether the BxCHL program enhances those skills, establish that most medical schools use this approach, or specifically identify knowledge of health care systems as a competency. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The BxCHL selection approach aligns with health equity and holistic admission processes supported by other prehealth programs and medical school admission committees.

    “This approach aligns with health equity and holistic admission processes supported by other prehealth programs and medical school admission committees.14,18”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]Marrast LM Zallman L Woolhandler S Bor DH McCormick D Minority physicians’ role in the care of underserved patients: diversifying the physician workforce may be key in addressing health disparities JAMA Intern Med 2014 174 290 1 24378807
  2. [4]Witzburg RA Sondheimer HM Holistic review – shaping the medical profession one applicant at a time N Engl J 2013 368 1565 7 23574032
  3. [5]Saha S Taking diversity seriously: the merits of increasing minority representation in medicine JAMA Intern Med 2014 174 291 2 24378744
  4. [6]Mahon KE Henderson MK Kirch DG Selecting tomorrow's physicians: the key to the future health care workforce Acad Med 2013 88 1806 11 24128626

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerrigan, N., Akabas, M. H., Betzler, T. F., Castaldi, M., Kelly, M. S., Levy, A. S., Reichgott, M. J., Ruberman, L., & Dolan, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Montefiore Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dolan, Siobhan M.
Venue
Medical Education Online
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
30000
ISSN
1087-2981 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2265503468
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Medical Education Online (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Association of American Medical Colleges
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
medical school admissions, holistic review, applicant evaluation, diversity in medical education, communication skills, extracurricular activities, personal and professional development, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
MeSH terms
College Admission Test, Communication, Humans, School Admission Criteria, Schools, Medical, Cultural Diversity, Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review