The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stochastic dynamic prediction1
Open accessAbstract
Stochastic dynamic prediction assumes the laws governing atmospheric behavior are entirely deterministic, but seeks solutions corresponding to probabilistic statements of the initial conditions, thus recognizing the impossibility of exact or sufficiently dense observations. The equation that must be solved is the continuity equation for probability. For practical reasons only approximate solutions to this equation are possible in general. Deterministic forecasts represent a very low order of approximation. More exact methods are developed and some of the attributes and advantages of stochastic dynamic predictions are illustrated by applying them to a low order set of dynamic equations.Stochastic dynamic predictions have significantly smaller mean square errors than deterministic procedures, and also give specific information on the nature and extent of the uncertainty of the forecast. Also the range of time over which useful forecasts can be obtained is extended. However, they also require considerably more extensive calculations.The question of analysis to obtain the initial stochastic statement of the atmospheric state is considered and one finds here too a promise of significant advantages over present deterministic methods. It is shown how the stochastic method can be used to assess the value of new or improved data by considering their influence on the decrease in the uncertainty of the forecast. Comparisons among physical-numerical models are also made more effectively by applying stochastic methods. Finally the implications of stochastic dynamic prediction on the question of predictability are briefly considered, with the conclusion that some earlier estimates have been too pessimistic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evensen, G. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/94jc00572 · Cited by 5,371
Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability
Kalnay, E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802270 · Cited by 3,391
The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction
Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., & Brunet, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14956 · Cited by 2,729
Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles.
Raftery, A. E., Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Polakowski, M. (2005) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr2906.1 · Cited by 1,915
The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation
Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N., & Petroliagis, T. (1996) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49712252905 · Cited by 1,616
Metadata
- Authors
- Epstein, E. S.
- Venue
- Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Stockholm University Press
- Published
- 1969-01-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 739
- ISSN
- 0280-6495 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0870
- OpenAlex
- W2057895204
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic dynamic prediction1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/tellusa.v21i6.10143
- The paper
- Epstein, E. S. (1969). Stochastic dynamic prediction1. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v21i6.10143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.