The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting - II. Calibration and combination
Abstract
The DEMETER multi-model ensemble system is used to investigate the enhancement in seasonal predictability that can be achieved by calibrating single-model ensembles and combining them to issue multi-model predictions. The forecast quality of both deterministic and probabilistic predictions is assessed and compared to the skill of a simple multi-model ensemble where all the single models are equally weighted. Both calibration and combination are carried out using crossvalidation. Single-model seasonal ensembles are calibrated using canonical correlation analysis for model adjustment and variance inflation for reliability enhancement. Results indicate that both model adjustment and inflation increase the skill of tropical predictions for single-model ensembles, provided that the training time series are long enough. Some improvements are also found for extratropical areas, although mostly due to an increase of reliability associated with the inflation. The beneficial impact of calibration is smaller for the simple multi-model than for the single-model ensembles due to the relatively high reliability of the former. The raw single-model predictions are also linearly combined using grid-point multiple linear regression to create an optimized multi-model system. Results indicate that the forecast quality of the simple multi-model ensemble is generally difficult to improve using multiple linear regression due to the lack of robustness of the regression coefficients. As in the case o…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For weather and seasonal forecasts, model errors can be measured empirically from forecast error statistics over many independent verification cases.
“On the shorter time scales of weather and seasonal forecasting, model errors exist equally, but their effects can be empirically quantified by sampling the forecast error statistics over a sufficiently large set of independent verification data (e.g., Raftery et al. 2005;Doblas-Reyes et al. 2005;Weigel et al. 2009).”
From Risks of Model Weighting in Multimodel Climate Projections (2010) · cites this paper as Doblas-Reyes et al. 2005
Cites
Richardson, D. S. (2001) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49712757715 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Risks of Model Weighting in Multimodel Climate Projections
Weigel, A. P., Knutti, R., Liniger, M. A., & Appenzeller, C. (2010) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2010jcli3594.1 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Stephenson, D. B., Coelho, C. A. S., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., & Balmaseda, M. (2005) · Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.3402/tellusa.v57i3.14664 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationSeasonal ensemble forecasts: Are recalibrated single models better than multimodels?
Weigel, A. P., Liniger, M. A., & Appenzeller, C. (2009) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/2008mwr2773.1 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Soil moisture memory and West African monsoon predictability: Artefact or reality?
Douville, H., Conil, S., Tyteca, S., & Voldoire, A. (2007) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0207-8 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Weigel, A. P., Liniger, M. A., & Appenzeller, C. (2007) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr3428.1 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Hagedorn, R., & Palmer, T. N.
- Affiliations
- European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB)
- Venue
- Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Stockholm University Press
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 234
- ISSN
- 0280-6495 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0870
- OpenAlex
- W1988615010
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 14.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- multi-model ensemble, seasonal forecasting, forecast calibration, ensemble combination, canonical correlation analysis, variance inflation, probabilistic forecasting, multiple linear regression, principal components, forecast reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review