Cited by 340Climate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsForecasting Techniques and Applications

The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting - II. Calibration and combination

Doblas-Reyes, Francisco J., Hagedorn, Renate, Palmer, T. N.·2005·Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography

Abstract

The DEMETER multi-model ensemble system is used to investigate the enhancement in seasonal predictability that can be achieved by calibrating single-model ensembles and combining them to issue multi-model predictions. The forecast quality of both deterministic and probabilistic predictions is assessed and compared to the skill of a simple multi-model ensemble where all the single models are equally weighted. Both calibration and combination are carried out using crossvalidation. Single-model seasonal ensembles are calibrated using canonical correlation analysis for model adjustment and variance inflation for reliability enhancement. Results indicate that both model adjustment and inflation increase the skill of tropical predictions for single-model ensembles, provided that the training time series are long enough. Some improvements are also found for extratropical areas, although mostly due to an increase of reliability associated with the inflation. The beneficial impact of calibration is smaller for the simple multi-model than for the single-model ensembles due to the relatively high reliability of the former. The raw single-model predictions are also linearly combined using grid-point multiple linear regression to create an optimized multi-model system. Results indicate that the forecast quality of the simple multi-model ensemble is generally difficult to improve using multiple linear regression due to the lack of robustness of the regression coefficients. As in the case o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/tellusa.v57i3.14658

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For weather and seasonal forecasts, model errors can be measured empirically from forecast error statistics over many independent verification cases.

    “On the shorter time scales of weather and seasonal forecasting, model errors exist equally, but their effects can be empirically quantified by sampling the forecast error statistics over a sufficiently large set of independent verification data (e.g., Raftery et al. 2005;Doblas-Reyes et al. 2005;Weigel et al. 2009).”

    From Risks of Model Weighting in Multimodel Climate Projections (2010) · cites this paper as Doblas-Reyes et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Hagedorn, R., & Palmer, T. N.
Affiliations
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB)
Venue
Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
Published
2005-01-01
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
234
ISSN
  • 0280-6495 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0870
OpenAlex
W1988615010
Cited by
340
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
multi-model ensemble, seasonal forecasting, forecast calibration, ensemble combination, canonical correlation analysis, variance inflation, probabilistic forecasting, multiple linear regression, principal components, forecast reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review