The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discussions on inclusion in times of biopolitics and neoliberalism: An analysis of three thesis
Open accessAbstract
This article aims to bring a discussion about inclusion in times of biopolitics and neoliberalism and, for that, we will present concepts and understandings about normalization, medicalization, and neoliberalism. In the search for an analytical movement and using the methodology of bibliographic research, we selected three academic works defended by the GEduMaD research group and we read them from the theoretical lens presented at the beginning of the text.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Rather than diversifying existing arrangements to be universally accessible, assistive technology is presented as a biopolitical device for the normalization and assimilation of individuals who do not fit into existing arrangements (Risso et al. 2023) and deviate from the 'autonomous … and able -self-contained individual' prescribed by the 'globalized biopolitical machine' of neoliberal governance”
From Accessibility and universal design in higher education curricula: implications for inclusion/exclusion (2025) · cites this paper as Risso et al. 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Pagni, P. A. (2017). A emergência do discurso da inclusão escolar na biopolítica: uma problematização em busca de um olhar mais radical. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 22 (68), 255-272.
- Silva, M. A. (2022). Currículo, Educação Matemática, Política e Podres Poderes. Revista Internacional de Pesquisa em Educação Matemática, 12(1), 9-28.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mavrou, K., Theodorou, E., Mouka, M., & Liasidou, A. (2025) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2025.2507244 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Risso, J. P., Donda Rodrigues, T., & Malinosky Coelho da Rosa, F.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
- Venue
- Prometeica - Revista de Filosofía y Ciencias
- Publisher
- Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo
- Published
- 2023-07-27
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 347-355
- ISSN
- 1852-9488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385303591
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Prometeica - Revista de Filosofía y Ciencias (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- inclusion, biopolitics, neoliberalism, normalization, medicalization, disability studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
