The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview
Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007 · Cited by 1,408
Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis
Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196 · Cited by 892
Solid waste management in European countries: A review of systems analysis techniques
Pires, A., Martinho, G., & Chang, N.-B. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.024 · Cited by 573
Large-vscale hydrogen production and storage technologies: Current status and future directions
Olabi, A. G., bahri, A. S., Abdelghafar, A. A., Baroutaji, A., Sayed, E. T., Alami, A. H., Rezk, H., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.110 · Cited by 492
Sustainability of additive manufacturing: An overview on its energy demand and environmental impact
Peng, T., Kellens, K., Tang, R., Chen, C., & Chen, G. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.022 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Publisher
- BSI British Standards
- Published
- 2015-06-10
- OpenAlex
- W4244609544
- Cited by
- 1,286
- References
- 0
- Type
- standard
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3403/01139131u
- The paper
- Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework. (2015). https://doi.org/10.3403/01139131u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
