The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Les rites comme actes d'institution
Abstract
The Instituting rites. What does the rite of passage separate ? A before and an after — circumcision, for example — or those the rite concerns and those it does not — men and women. In the crossing of the line, should one consider the crossing, as the expression «rite of passage» implies, or the line itself, the arbitrary limit which the rite of institution — in the active sense of «instituting» — consecrates and legitimates ? The instituting rite, an act of social magic, owes its symbolic efficacy to the fact that it signifies to a man what he is and what he has to be : «become what you are». The work of institution is a process of inculcation which treats the body as a memory so as to induce a second nature : social function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fusaschi, M. (2023) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/s41443-022-00542-y · Cited by 26
Textual Authority and Its Naturalization in Liang Shuming's Dong–Xi wenhua ji qi zhexue
Major, P. (2017) · Monumenta Serica · doi:10.1080/02549948.2017.1309115 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourdieu, P.
- Venue
- Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-63
- ISSN
- 0335-5322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045557659
- Cited by
- 822
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.