Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Actividades minero metalúrgicas prehispánicas en el Noroeste argentino. Nuevas evidencias y su significación

Scattolin, María Cristina, Williams, Verónica·1992·Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines

Abstract

Pre-hispanic metallurgical-mining activities in the Argentine northwest - New evidence and its significance Abstract Testimony of the pre-hispanic metallurgical-mining activity was found in two sites next to Aconquija, near the Capillitas mineral deposits (Catamarca, Argentina). An attempt to evaluate the significance of such activity is reached through the analysis of archaeological evidence and its consolidation to the entire production process. An association is settled between the deposits location with natural resources and in particular, with minerals of the region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3406/bifea.1992.1056

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Scattolin, M. C., & Williams, V.
Venue
Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines
Published
1992
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
59-87
ISSN
0303-7495
Cited by
11
References
0
Language
fr

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review