Le manichéisme vu par l'Histoire ecclésiastique d'Eusèbe de Césarée
Open accessAbstract
Contrairement à une opinion reçue, on peut tirer quelques informations du bref paragraphe de l’Histoire ecclésiastique d’Eusèbe de Césarée sur les manichéens. Il témoigne du fait que le manichéisme commence à être perçu dans l’Empire romain au moment où il pénètre en Egypte, dans le dernier quart du IIIe s. Jean-Daniel Dubois montre que la présentation hérésiologique d’Eusèbe, inspirée de la législation impériale contre les manichéens, va contribuer de manière définitive à qualifier le manichéisme d’hérésie du christianisme .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many anti-Manichaean authors like Eusebius would relate the name of Mani with the Greek word for madman (μανείς), which in some instances caused the Manichees to double the Greek nu in their name, to Μαννιχαῖος.
“In a polemical pun, many anti-Manichaean authors like Eusebius (Hist.eccl.7.31; see Dubois 1993:336-339; Coyle 2009:14)”
From Identity-formation and alterity in John Chrysostom’s in Epistulam Ad Galatas commentarius (2014) · cites this paper as Dubois 1993:336-339
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 2
- Authors
- Dubois, J.-D.
- Corresponding author
- Dubois, Jean-Daniel
- Venue
- Études théologiques et religieuses
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-339
- ISSN
- 0014-2239 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2464628751
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- green
- www.persee.fr
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Études théologiques et religieuses (publishedVersion)
- Périodiques Scientifiques en Édition Électronique (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- Manichaeism, Eusebius of Caesarea, heresy, Roman Empire, early Christian polemics, Manichaeans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
