Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Rise and Fall of the Amazon Chiefdoms

Roosevelt, Anna Curtenius·1993·L'Homme

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3406/hom.1993.369640

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Terra preta soils are anthropogenic soil types usually formed between 500 and 2500 years ago.

    “These anthropogenic soil types were usually formed between 500 and 2500 years ago and contain significantly higher nutrient levels than typical Amazonian soils [4,20,23-28].”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Terra preta soils contain significantly higher nutrient levels than typical Amazonian soils.

    “These anthropogenic soil types were usually formed between 500 and 2500 years ago and contain significantly higher nutrient levels than typical Amazonian soils [4,20,23-28].”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Roosevelt, A. C.
Venue
L'Homme
Published
1993
Volume
33
Issue
126
Pages
255-283
ISSN
0439-4216
Cited by
27
References
0
Language
fr

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review