The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Les plantes chinoises en France au XVIIIe siècle : médiation et transmission
Abstract
L'introduction des plantes chinoises en France couvrant des aspects très divers, nous en avons privilégié trois. En premier lieu, nous analysons, au travers d'une étude prosopographique des principaux auteurs de l'introduction des plantes chinoises en France au XVIIIe siècle, le rôle des institutions dans cette grande entreprise. Puis, en deuxième partie, nous montrons comment les plantes chinoises, simples objets d'histoire naturelle permirent d'une part de raviver et de maintenir l'intérêt des autorités pour la mission en Chine et d'autre part de s'introduire auprès de l'empereur afin de pénétrer dans ses jardins. Ayant alors la possibilité d'enquêter et de collecter des graines et des informations sur les plantes chinoises, les missionnaires purent répondre à l'attente des demandeurs. Leurs envois ne se limitèrent pas aux graines, mais s'accompagnèrent de notes ou de mémoires sur leur culture, leurs usages etc. Thème que nous développons en troisième partie.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Horticultural Society of London, which in the 1810s asked Reeves to send colored drawings of Chinese ornamental plants to assist them in selecting some specific species, awarded him a medal on July 7, 1818.$^{7}$^{1}”
From Transnational Travels of the Caterpillar Fungus in the Fifteenth through Nineteenth Centuries (2017) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, he sent many biological specimens, seeds, and living plants that he collected or cultivated in China to the latter.”
From Transnational Travels of the Caterpillar Fungus in the Fifteenth through Nineteenth Centuries (2017) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.3406/befeo.1983.1461 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transnational Travels of the Caterpillar Fungus in the Fifteenth through Nineteenth Centuries
Lu, D. (2017) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341387 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Genest, M.-P.
- Corresponding author
- Genest, Marie-Pierre
- Venue
- Journal d'agriculture traditionnelle et de botanique appliquée
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-47
- ISSN
- 0183-5173 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055646994
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal d agriculture traditionnelle et de botanique appliquée (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Natural History
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Names and Ethnobotany
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
- Keywords
- Chinese flora, plant introduction, 18th century, France, Jesuit missionaries, China missions, natural history, botanical gardens, seed exchange, plant uses, prosopography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
