The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Michel Leiris devant le colonialisme
Abstract
Contrairement a l'ecole africaine de M. Griaule qui defendait quant aux societes africaines l'idee de societes froides donc hors de l'histoire (donc hors de l'incidence du colonialisme), M. Leiris a constamment denonce le rapport de sujetion entretenu dans ces societes par la situation coloniale, de meme que le lien ambigu qui unit l'ethnologie et le colonialisme
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this respect Bourdieu was responding to the most recent French ethnological writing at the time, which had broken with the ahistoricity of earlier ethnologists like Marcel Griaule, whose writing 'almost never referred to the colonial context' (Arditi, 1990).”
From Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology (2011) · cites this paper as Arditi, 1990
Citations
Cited by
Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology
Steinmetz, G. (2011) · Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1177/1749975510389912 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Arditi, C.
- Corresponding author
- Arditi, Claude
- Venue
- Journal des anthropologues
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-99
- ISSN
- 1156-0428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2332977280
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal des anthropologues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Studies and Colonialism
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Keywords
- Michel Leiris, colonialism, African societies, African schools, colonial subjectivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
