Archéologie du Xinjiang des origines aux Han. Première partie.
Open accessAbstract
Les récents développements de l'archéologie protohistorique au Xinjiang permettent de redater les vestiges pré-Han autrefois globalement attribués au Néolithique et de les organiser en « groupes culturels » rattachables au Néolithique, à l'Age du Bronze et à l'Age du Fer (cette dernière période sera traitée en seconde partie*). Après un Paléolithique dont les composants ne sont pas encore connus, les vestiges néolithiques (ou mésolithiques ?) les plus anciens remontent à 9000-8000 ВС et se caractérisent par des assemblages microlithiques non géométriques probablement issus des traditions du Paléolithique final de la Chine du Nord, mais présentant aussi des rapports possibles avec certaines cultures d'Asie centrale. Ces vestiges sont actuellement les seuls qui puissent être attribués au Néolithique, période encore très mal connue au Xinjiang faute de découvertes. Après un long hiatus, plusieurs ensembles culturels (le plus ancien est daté ca. 1800 ВС) sont rattachés à l'Age du Bronze. Témoins de populations qui semblent avoir été en majorité de type europoïde, ils montrent des liens tantôt avec le monde des steppes au sens large, tantôt avec des cultures sédentaires de Chine ou d'Asie centrale.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although the findings seem to suggest an evolution in certain local cultures from an earlier agricultural stratum to a later nomadic stratum, this cultural and temporal divide is by no means as clear-cut as it is sometimes made to appear.
“Although the findings seem to suggest an evolution in certain local cultures—such as Sidaogou (Debaine-Francfort 1988:25)—from an earlier agricultural stratum (roughly comparable with the Lower Xiajiadian stratum) to a later nomadic stratum, this cultural and temporal divide is by no means as clear-cut as it is sometimes made to appear.”
From Ancient Inner Asian Nomads: Their Economic Basis and Its Significance in Chinese History (1994) · cites this paper as Debaine-Francfort 1988
The indexed copy’s introduction (pp. 6–8) cautions that its cultural typology and chronology are provisional, but those passages do not describe Sidaogou’s subsistence or a transition from agriculture to nomadism. Searches for Sidaogou, agricultural and nomadic terms, and Xiajiadian did not retrieve the cited discussion on p. 25, so the specific example cannot be verified from the passages available here. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ancient Inner Asian Nomads: Their Economic Basis and Its Significance in Chinese History
Di Cosmo, N. (1994) · The Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.2307/2059235 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
- Authors
- Debaine-Francfort, C.
- Venue
- Paléorient
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-29
- ISSN
- 0153-9345 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009227334
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Paléorient (publishedVersion)
- Périodiques Scientifiques en Édition Électronique (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Keywords
- Neolithic, Bronze Age, Iron Age, cultural groups, Paleolithic, Central Asian culture, steppe populations, Eurasian connections, chronology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
