Cited by 122Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsEconomic and Fiscal Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

La redistribution fiscale face au chômage

Open access
Piketty, Thomas·1997·Revue française d'économie

Abstract

In France, the main objective of structural tax/benefit reform has been to cut low-wage payroll contributions, so as to cut labor costs and boost low-wage labor demand. Other countries, such as the U.S., have tried to boost low-wage labor supply by granting earned income tax credits to low-wage workers. This papers takes into account both demand and supply effects at different wage levels and offers a theoretical analysis of these strategies, as well as a numerical application to the french case. The main conclusion is that the very high effective marginal tax rates (80-90 %) imposed on low-wage workers in France, even though they admit some theoretical justifications, have problably reached their limits, and that significant job creations could be obtained by cutting those rates, for exemple by cutting the employee payroll tax imposed at the level of the minimum wage. The employer payroll tax cuts introduced by the Balladur-Juppé governments can only stimulate labor demand, since they vanish at a very high rate in case they are shifted to the employee. It is possible that this reduces dratiscally their efficiency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3406/rfeco.1997.1016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The occupational model of Piketty (1997) and Saez (2004b) can be easily extended to accommodate rent-seeking externalities among top earners, while preserving the Mirrlees formula plus Pigouvian correction additive decomposition that is standard in optimal taxation with externalities.

    “The key point of the model presented in this appendix is to show that the occupational model of Piketty (1997) and Saez (2004b) can be easily extended to accommodate rent-seeking externalities among top earners, while preserving the Mirrlees formula plus Pigouvian correction additive decomposition that is standard in optimal taxation with externalities.”

    From Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities (2014) · cites this paper as Piketty (1997)

  • Piketty (1997) and Saez (2004b) showed that if individuals make solely occupational choices as in the appendix model presented here, the standard (discrete version of the) Mirrlees formula carries over because the nonlinear income tax can then undo wage changes across sectors.

    “In contrast, Piketty (1997) and Saez (2004b) showed that if individuals make solely occupational choices as in the appendix model presented here, the standard (discrete version of the) Mirrlees formula carries over because the nonlinear income tax can then undo wage changes across sectors.”

    From Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities (2014) · cites this paper as Piketty (1997)

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Piketty, T.
Corresponding author
Piketty, Thomas
Venue
Revue française d'économie
Published
1997
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
157-201
ISSN
0769-0479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021990978
Cited by
122
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Revue française d économie (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Persée (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
tax redistribution, unemployment, low-wage workers, payroll taxes, effective marginal tax rates, Earned Income Tax Credit, labor demand, labor supply, minimum wage, tax and benefit reform, France, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review