The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pour une histoire de la correspondance familiale.
Open accessAbstract
Dauphin Cécile. Pour une histoire de la correspondance familiale. In: Romantisme, 1995, n°90. "J'ai toujours aimé les correspondances..." pp. 89-99.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“but this figure implies that women wrote fewer than one letter in ten mailed in mid-nineteenth century France (Dauphin, 1995, pp. 92-93).”
From Understanding the Writing Revolution of the Late Nineteenth Century (2025) · cites this paper as Dauphin, 1995, pp. 92-93
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Writing Culture of Ordinary People in Europe, c.1860–1920
Lyons, M. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139093538 · Cited by 147
New Directions in the History of Written Culture
Lyons, M. (2012) · Culture & History Digital Journal · doi:10.3989/chdj.2012.007 · Cited by 38
The Power of the Scribe: Delegated Writing in Modern Europe
Lyons, M. (2014) · European History Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0265691414526342 · Cited by 13
“Similarly, out of 158 million postal items franked in France in 1849, personal as opposed to business correspondence accounted for approximately 10 per cent of the total, which leads historians to estimate that perhaps nine out of ten letters were written by men in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.(31) We should…”
BackgroundHurlburt, S. (2017) · Histoire sociale · doi:10.1353/his.2017.0037 · Cited by 6
Lyons, M. (2014) · Modern Italy · doi:10.1080/13532944.2014.939162 · Cited by 5
“Like all private correspondence, as Cécile Dauphin has reminded us, love letters are self-referential, constantly discussing the problems of writing and transmission; and, perhaps more intensely than other forms of correspondence, love letters deploy strategies for attracting sympathy for the writer, and for encourag…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Dauphin, C.
- Corresponding author
- Dauphin, Cécile
- Venue
- Romantisme
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 90
- Pages
- 89-99
- ISSN
- 0048-8593 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025544215
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- green
- www.persee.fr
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Romantisme (publishedVersion)
- Persée (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › French Literature and Criticism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Biographical and Historical Analysis
- Keywords
- family correspondence, Romanticism, letter writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
