Cited by 1Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

연하장애 분야의 인공지능 적용

Open access
Seong Jae Lee·2020·Journal of the Korean Dysphagia Society

Abstract

The development and performance of Artificial intelligence (AI) have been revolutionary ever since adoption of deeplearning algorithms. It is expected that AI will induce tremendous changes in many parts of society and industry,including medicine. The spread of AI is accelerated by the availability of extensive Open Source Libraries and commonplatforms. Importance of data acquisition is increasingly emphasized for AI learning. Digitalization of imagesand medical records will contribute greatly to the application of AI technology in medical fields. Support systemsfor reading diagnostic images and decision-making for patient care are currently under development, depending onthe efficiency and precision of AI. Evaluation and management of dysphasia can be potentiated by AI, althoughthere is not much research in this field. Automated reading of videofluoroscopy, analysis of cervical auscultation,and dysphagia coaching system have all shown promising results. Hopefully, safer and more efficient care of dysphagiapatients will be possible through more active research on the utilization of AI technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.34160/jkds.2020.10.1.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integration of AI in healthcare can enhance professionals' efficiency by optimizing data management and influencing decisions.

    “The integration of AI in healthcare can enhance professionals' efficiency by optimizing data management and influencing decisions(8).”

    From Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of dysphagia: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The indexed copy’s title and citation information (pp. 4–9) identify a paper about AI in dysphagia, but the retrieved passages do not discuss healthcare professionals’ efficiency, data management, or decision-making. Searches for those concepts in English and Korean returned metadata and references rather than a passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 1

Authors
Lee, S. J.
Corresponding author
Seong Jae Lee
Venue
Journal of the Korean Dysphagia Society
Published
2020-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
4-9
ISSN
  • 2233-5978 (ISSN-L)
  • 2713-6191
OpenAlex
W3003894209
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Journal of the Korean Dysphagia Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence, dysphagia, dysphagia management, videofluoroscopy, cervical auscultation, medical image analysis, decision support, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review