Cited by 0Geotechnical and construction materials studiesGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationMaterials Engineering and Processing

Effect of Soil Stabilization Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Alkali Activated Solutions on Rigid Pavement Cost

Open access
Karabaş, Bahadır, Uzer, Ali Ulvi, Akbulut, Nurullah, Bölücü, Abdurrahman·2026·Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science

Abstract

This paper examines how stabilizing road subgrade soils with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and alkali-activated solution (AAS) influences both rigid pavement layer thicknesses and initial investment expenditures. For this investigation, bentonite (BT) samples representing the subgrade soil were blended with GGBFS and AAS solutions formulated with 8 molar sodium hydroxide at weight percentages of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. Proctor and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) trials were carried out on the prepared formulations. Following a 28-day curing stage, the maximum compressive strength performance was observed in the 10% GGBFS+AAS blends. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) assessments conducted on the control soil versus the optimum 10% GGBFS+AAS mixture indicated an 11.80 fold enhancement in the CBR performance of the modified soil. Based on structural designs and economic evaluations performed in compliance with AASHTO 1993 guidelines, the results demonstrate that ground stabilization using 10% GGBFS+AAS optimizes concrete pavement layer configurations, yielding a 1.42% reduction in initial construction costs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.34248/bsengineering.1980846

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Karabaş, B., Uzer, A. U., Akbulut, N., & Bölücü, A.
Affiliations
  • Inonu University (TR)
  • Kayseri Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau (DE)
  • Hasan Kalyoncu University (TR)
Venue
Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science
Published
2026-09-15
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
2259-2268
ISSN
2619-8991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7212997279
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science (publishedVersion)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Materials Engineering and Processing
Keywords
soil stabilization, ground granulated blast furnace slag, concrete pavements, subgrade soil, bentonite, pavement layer thickness, construction cost reduction, California bearing ratio, unconfined compressive strength, sodium hydroxide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review