The DOI matches its Crossref record.
‘The Playful Entrepreneur’ Fostering Entrepreneurial Education in Early Childhood Education
Open accessAbstract
This study explores the integration of entrepreneurial education within early childhood settings in Ireland, focusing on embedding entrepreneurial capabilities at the foundational stages of education. Recognising the critical role that early experiences play in lifelong learning, this research advocates for equipping preschool children with essential 21st-century skills, such as independence, creativity and problem-solving. Despite significant investment in early childhood education, the integration of entrepreneurial education remains limited within existing pedagogical frameworks, which prioritise social, emotional, and cognitive skills without explicitly addressing entrepreneurial capabilities. Utilising a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach, the study examines how early childhood educators can foster an entrepreneurial mindset, attitude, and capabilities among preschool children. It develops a comprehensive conceptual framework, providing a scaffold for the effective integration of entrepreneurial education into preschool settings. The research emphasises the crucial role of early childhood educators as facilitators of entrepreneurial learning, and considers the policies and training programmes that either facilitate or impede this integration. A key finding is the importance of ‘play’ as a powerful tool for entrepreneurial learning, enabling children to develop creativity, problem-solving skills, and independence through exploration and experimentation. The proposed early Entrepreneurial Education (eEE) Framework offers an innovative, structured approach to embedding entrepreneurial education in early childhood education curricula, enhancing educator training, and informing policy development. This thesis contributes to the broader dialogue on advancing educational strategies, preparing young learners for a global society that values entrepreneurial capabilities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although many teachers have attended workshops on coding (and robotics), they often report that the training is insufficient or lacks practical implementation strategies. 34”
From Integrating Play-Based Learning with Coding for Early Childhood Mathematics Education in Under-Resourced Schools (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selepe, M. A., & Willemse, K. (2025) · Journal of Education and Learning Technology · doi:10.38159/jelt.2025695
Mortarboard Review: Montessori-Related Dissertations, 2024
Parham, J., Wood, K. K., & Campanelli, C. (2025) · Journal of Montessori Research · doi:10.17161/jomr.v11i1.23736
Grigorjeva, A. (2026) · DSpace repository (University of Tartu)
Metadata
- Authors
- Munster Technological University, & Murray, T.
- Affiliations
- Munster Technological University (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Murray, Trudie
- ORCID
- Murray, Trudie
- Publisher
- Munster Technological University
- Published
- 2024-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4404107421
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Sword
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- entrepreneurship education, early childhood education, preschool children, entrepreneurial capabilities, play-based learning, creativity, problem-solving skills, independence, 21st century skills, early childhood educators, teacher professional development, curriculum integration, education policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review