Cited by 2Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureSmart Grid Energy ManagementOptimal Power Flow Distribution

Scheduled charging of electric vehicles and the increase of hosting capacity by a stationary energy storage

Open access
Kröger, David, Rauma, Kalle, Spina, Alfio, Rehtanz, Christian·2019·AIM

Abstract

The advancing electrification of the transportation andheating sector is expected to cause several operationalchallenges for distribution system operators (DSO),mainly in the form of thermal overloading of assets andvoltage limit violations. Especially, low voltage (LV)networks are prone to failure.In order to integrate electric vehicles (EVs) into LVnetworks, two charge scheduling algorithms for EVs arepresented. The scheduling algorithms, namely “Basic-Scheduling” and “Time-Of-Use (TOU)-Schedulingdistribute the power demand of EVs pro-actively to preventdetrimental effects on power grids.A simulated case study of a residential area including 20dwellings has shown that both, “Basic-Scheduling” and“TOU-Scheduling” can effectively mitigate assetoverloading. Different examinations regarding theenvironmental conditions have been carried out.Another objective pursued was the examination on how astationary battery energy storage system (BESS) canincrease the hosting capacity of a network. Commerciallyavailable Vanadium-Redox-Flow batteries (VRFB) arevirtually integrated in the network of the residential area.A 30 kW/100 kWh VRFB was able to relieve transformeroverloading in three out of four cases for uncontrolled EVcharging. Only in a modified scenario, transformeroverloading occurred. A 50 kW/200 kWh VRFB mitigatedtransformer overloading in every scenario considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.34890/829

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kröger, D., Rauma, K., Spina, A., & Rehtanz, C.
Venue
AIM
Publisher
AIM
Published
2019-06-03
OpenAlex
W3082116040
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CIRED
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Keywords
electric vehicle charging scheduling, low-voltage distribution networks, transformer overload, hosting capacity, vanadium redox flow battery, voltage violation, residential EV charging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review