The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In and beyond the camp: The rise of resilience in refugee governance
Open accessAbstract
This paper analyzes recent changes in the policies and practices through which displaced populations are governed by humanitarian and state actors. In particular, we examine how the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) is increasingly operationalizing its protection mandate by linking the more longstanding logic of self-reliance with the newer idea of resilience, itself composed of both micro (individual) and macro (societal and particularly urban) strands. Using Uganda as a site of analysis, we suggest that the linking of the more entrenched concept of self-reliance with resilience is another step forward in the entwining of UNHCR’s traditional humanitarian mandate with the developmental goals promoted by other global aid organizations. Resilience emerges in this context as a policy ideal that brings together disparate strands of operational aspirations into one multifaceted objective to govern refugees both within and beyond the camp/settlement structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For most people, this means that subsistence farming and small-scale market activities constitute the main route to self-reliance (Bohnet and Schmitz-Pranghe 2019;Oliver and Boyle 2019).”
From Throwing therapy at the problem mental health and humanitarian intervention in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda (2023) · cites this paper as Oliver and Boyle 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Both resilience and psy frameworks gained prominence in the context of the current humanitarian response to the global refugee crisis, at a time in which the aid industry is particularly dominated by market-centric, neoliberal imaginaries (Oliver and Boyle 2019).”
From Throwing therapy at the problem mental health and humanitarian intervention in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda (2023) · cites this paper as Oliver and Boyle 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The result of this shift was a form of humanitarianism which main aim was no longer limited to the provision of food and shelter, instead increasingly focusing on affected individuals' and communities' existing capacity to recover from crisis through the fostering and mobilisation of their own resilience (Oliver and Boyle 2019), which I expand on in Chapter 4.”
From Throwing therapy at the problem mental health and humanitarian intervention in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda (2023) · cites this paper as Oliver and Boyle 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- Agier, M., 2012. From refuge the ghetto is born: Contemporary figures of heterotopias. In: R. Hutchison and B.D. Haynes, eds., The Ghetto: Contemporary Global Issues and Controversies. Boulder: Westview Press, 265–292. · DOI
- Ahimbisibwe, F., 2014. The self-reliance strategy and refugee livelihoods: Evidence from Oruchinga Refugee Settlement, South Western Uganda. International Research Journal of Social Sciences [online], 4(5), 59–65. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317427507_The_Self_Reliance_Strategy_and_Refugee_Livelihoods_Evidence_from_Oruchinga_Refugee_Settlement_South_Western_Uganda [Accessed 13 December 2018].
- Aradau, C., 2014. The promise of security: resilience, surprise, and epistemic politics. Resilience: International Policies, Practices, and Discourses [online], 2(2), 73–87. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21693293.2014.914765 [Accessed 18 December 2018]. · DOI
- Barnett, L., 2002. Global governance and the evolution of the international refugee regime. International Journal of Refugee Law [online], 14(2/3), 238–262. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/14.2_and_3.238 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI
- Béné, C., et al., 2014. Review article: resilience, poverty, & development. Journal of International Development [online], 26, 598–623. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2992 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI
- Bernstein, J., and Okello, M.C., 2007. To be or not to be: Urban refugees in Kampala. Refuge [online], 24(1), 46–56. Available from: https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21367 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI
- Buscher, D., 2011. New approaches to urban refugee livelihoods. Refuge, 28(2), 17–29. · DOI
- Chandler, D., 2014. Resilience: The Governance of Complexity. London/New York: Routledge. · DOI
- Chimni, B., 2009. The birth of a “discipline”: from refugee to forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies [online], 22(1), 11–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen051 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI · Paper page
- Diken, B., and Laustsen, C., 2006. The Camp. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography [online], 88(4), 443–452. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00232.x [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI
- Dryden-Peterson, S., and Hovil, L., 2004. A remaining hope for durable solutions: local integration of refugees and their hosts in the case of Uganda. Refuge [online], 22(1), 26–38. Available from: https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21315 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI
- Duffield, M., 2012. Challenging environments: danger, resilience and the aid industry. Security Dialogue [online], 43(5), 475–492. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0967010612457975 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI
- Easton-Calabria, E., and Omata, N., 2018. Panacea for the refugee crisis? Rethinking the promotion of “self-reliance” for refugees. Third World Quarterly [online]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1458301 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI · Paper page
- Evans, B., and Reid, J., 2014. Resilient Life: The Art of Living Dangerously. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Gorman, R., 1986. Beyond ICARA II: implementing refugee-related development assistance. The International Migration Review [online], 20(2), 283–298. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12267852 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI
- Government of Uganda and UNHCR, 2004. Self-reliance strategy (1999–2003): For refugee hosting areas in Moyo, Arua, and Adjumani districts, Uganda, Report of the Mid-term Review (RLSS Mission Report 2004/03) [online]. April. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/41c6a4fc4.pdf [Accessed 1 April 2018].
- Haldrup, S.V., and Rosén, F., 2017. Developing resilience: a retreat from grand planning. In: D. Chandler and J. Coaffee, eds., The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience. London/New York: Routledge, 358–369.
- Hammerstad, A., 2000. Whose security? UNHCR, refugee protection and state security after the Cold War. Security Dialogue [online], 31(4), 391–403. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0967010600031004002 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI
- Hansen, R., 2018. The comprehensive refugee response framework: A commentary. Journal of Refugee Studies [online], 31(2), 131–151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fey020 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI · Paper page
- Harild, N., 2016. Forced displacement: a development issue with humanitarian elements. Forced Migration Review [online], nº. 52, 4–7. Available from: https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/solutions/harild.pdf [Accessed 13 December 2018].
- Hovil, L., 2007. Self-settled refugees in Uganda: an alternative approach to displacement? Journal of Refugee Studies [online], 20(4), 599–620. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem035 [Accessed 13 December 2018]. · DOI · Paper page
- Hovil, L., 2014. Local integration. In: E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford University Press, 488–498.
- Hyndman, J., 2000. Managing Displacement: Refugees and the Politics of Humanitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Hyndman, J., and Giles, W., 2011. Waiting for what? The feminization of asylum in protracted situations. Gender, Place and Culture [online], 18(3), 361–379. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2011.566347 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Ilcan, S., and Rygiel, K., 2015. “Resiliency humanitarianism”: Responsibilizing refugees through humanitarian emergency governance in the camp. International Political Sociology [online], 9, 333–351. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12101 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI · Paper page
- Ilcan, S., Oliver, M., and Connoy, L., 2017. Humanitarian assistance, refugee management, and self-reliance schemes: Nakivale refugee settlement. In: L. Good-Gingrich and S. Köngeter, eds., Transnational Social Policy: Social Support in a World on the Move. London/New York: Routledge. · DOI
- Jacobsen, K., 2002. Livelihoods in conflict: the pursuit of livelihoods by refugees and the impact on the human security of host communities. International Migration [online], 40(5), 95–123. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00213 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Johnson, H., 2011. Click to donate: Visual images, constructing victims and imagining the female refugee. Third World Quarterly [online], 32(6), 1015–1037. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.586235 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Johnson, H., 2014. Borders, Asylum and Global Non-Citizenship: The Other Side of the Fence. Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Joseph, J., 2013. Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: governmentality approach. Resilience: International Polices, Practices, and Discourses [online], 1(1), 38–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.765741 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Kibreab, G., 2007. Why governments prefer spatially segregated settlement sites for urban refugees. Refuge [online], 24(1), 27–35. Available from: https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21365 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Krause, U., 2016. Limitations of development-oriented assistance in Uganda. Forced Migration Review [online], nº. 52, 51–53. Available from: https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/solutions/krause.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
- Larner, W., and Moreton, S., 2016. Creating resilient subjects: the coexist project. In: M. Brady and R. Lippert, eds., Governing Practices: Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and the Ethnographic Imaginary. University of Toronto Press, 35–56. · DOI
- Loescher, G., and Milner, J., 2011. UNHCR and the global governance of refugees. In: A. Betts, ed., Global Migration Governance. Oxford University Press, 189–209. · DOI
- Methmann, C., and Oels, A., 2015. From “fearing” to “empowering” climate refugees: governing climate-induced migration in the name of resilience. Security Dialogue [online], 46(1), 51–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0967010614552548 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Milner, J., 2014. Protracted refugee situations. In: E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford University Press, 151–162.
- Newhouse, L., 2015. More than mere survival: violence, humanitarian governance, and practical material politics in a Kenya refugee camp. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space [online], 47(11), 2292–2308. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fa140106p [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- O Ensor, M., 2010. Education and self-reliance in Egypt. Forced Migration Review [online], nº. 34, 25–26. Available from: https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/urban-displacement/ensor.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2018].
- O’Connor, D., et al., 2017. Living with insecurity: Food security, resilience, and the World Food Programme (WFP). Global Social Policy [online], 17(1), 3–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018116658776 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Oliver, M., and Ilcan, S., 2018. The politics of protection: the right to food in protracted refugee situations. Refugee Survey Quarterly [online], 37(4), 440–457. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdy013 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI · Paper page
- Omata, N., 2013. “Community resilience or shared destitution?” Refugees’ internal assistance in a deteriorating economic environment. Community Development Journal [online], 48(2), 264–279. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bss057 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Owens, P., 2009. Reclaiming “bare life”?: Against Agamben on refugees. International Relations [online], 23(4), 567–582. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117809350545 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Ramadan, A., 2013. Spatialising the refugee camp. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers [online], 38(1), 65–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00509.x [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Rogers, P., 2015. Researching resilience: an agenda for change. Resilience: International Polices, Practices, and Discourses [online], 3(1), 55–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2014.988914 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Rose, N., O’Malley, P., and Valverde, M., 2006. Governmentality. Annual Review of Law & Social Science [online], vol. 2, 83–104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
- Sharpe, M., and Namusobya. S., 2012. Refugee status determination and the rights of recognized refugees under Uganda’s Refugees Act 2006. International Journal of Refugee Law, 24(3), 561–78. · DOI
- Walker, J., and Cooper, M., 2011. Genealogies of resilience: from systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42(2), 143–160. · DOI · Paper page
- Welsh, M., 2014. Resilience and responsibility: governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographic Journal [online], 180(1), 15–26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12012 [Accessed 14 December 2018]. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Torre, C. (2023) · London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) · doi:10.21953/lse.00004557
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, M., & Boyle, P.
- Affiliations
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Venue
- Oñati Socio-Legal Series
- Published
- 2020-12-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1107-1132
- ISSN
- 2079-5971 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2952321962
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Oñati Socio-legal Series (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- refugee camps, UNHCR, refugee self-reliance, resilience, refugee governance, development aid, refugee settlement, Uganda, refugee policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review