Cited by 41BIM and Construction IntegrationSemantic Web and OntologiesSustainable Supply Chain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Proposed Material Passport Ontology to Enable Circularity for Industrialized Construction

Kedir, Firehiwot, Bucher, David F., Hall, Daniel M.·2021·Computing in Construction

Abstract

There is a need to collect, store, and share product data to enable circularity in industrialized construction supply chains. To do this, the concept of a Material Passport (MP) has been proposed, but exactly how MPs should be created and managed is less understood, especially in consideration of industrialized construction product platforms. This paper proposes a knowledge and process representation framework called the Material Passport Ontology (MPO). The MPO outlines key components of MPs and their interrelationships. Finally, the paper discusses several implementation challenges and possibilities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35490/ec3.2021.159

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review found that other challenging areas of integration include the nature of data itself, with reports of data being recorded manually or in response to specific business and procurement models, and negative impacts of driving designers to select from limited databases.

    “Other challenging areas of integration comprise the nature of data itself, with reports of data being recorded manually or in response to specific business and procurement models (Kedir et al., 2021), as well as the negative impacts of driving designers to select from limited databases (Honic et al., 2019a).”
  • Recent research has scoped opportunities for automated data collection for MPs, providing opportunity for dynamic data repositories for repurposed materials which can be 'mined' as part of urban-wide policies.

    “Within this professional environment, recent research has scoped opportunities for automated data collection for MPs (Kedir, Bucher, & Hall, 2021), providing opportunity for dynamic data repositories for repurposed materials (Rose & Stegemann, 2019) which can be 'mined' as part of urban-wide policies (Honic et al., 2019c).”
  • The review identified nuance in the dataset: some authors favour the integration of data while others emphasise coexistence and interoperability across datasets similar to BIM federated architectures.

    “Here we identify some nuance in the dataset, with some authors favouring the integration of data (Kedir et al., 2021;Kovacic & Honic, 2021;Panza et al., 2023) and others bringing attention to the coexistence (Buchholz & Lützkendorf, 2022) and interoperability (Çetin et al., 2023) across datasets similar to BIM federated architectures (Beach et al., 2017).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kedir, F., Bucher, D. F., & Hall, D. M.
Venue
Computing in Construction
Published
2021-07-26
Volume
2
Pages
91-98
ISSN
2684-1150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3200404924
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
10.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computing in construction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
material passports, circular construction, industrialized construction, product data management, knowledge representation, product platforms, supply chain data sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review