Cited by 15BIM and Construction IntegrationRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Supply Chain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enabling reuse of prefabricated concrete components through multiple tracking technologies and digital twins

Open access
Dervishaj, Arlind, Hernández Vargas, José, Gudmundsson, Kjartan·2023·Computing in Construction

Abstract

Tracking of building components can be instrumental in reuse for a Circular Economy. Tracking technologies (TT) for building components can be used to identify and access information for decision-making from deconstruction to design for reuse. Prior research has mainly been concerned with single technologies, limited life cycle applicability and new construction. This study aims to explore the potential of combining multiple technologies, such as QR codes, NFC, and Bluetooth tags, with BIM to support reuse along the life cycles of prefabricated concrete components. The benefits and limitations of choices in TT are examined concerning information integration in circular construction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35490/ec3.2023.220

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Abbott, E.L.S., Chua, D.K.H., 2020. The Intelligent use of RFID and BIM in Prefabricated, Prefinished, Volumetric Construction Work Flow. MATEC Web of Conferences 312, 04005. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202031204005 · DOI
  2. Alsafouri, S., Ayer, S.K., 2018. Review of ICT Implementations for Facilitating Information Flow between Virtual Models and Construction Project Sites. Autom Constr 86, 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2017.10.005 · DOI
  3. Byers, B.S., Cheriyamulla, S., Ewason, J., Hall, D.M., de Wolf, C., 2022. Using engraved QR codes to connect building components to materials passports for circular construction, in: European Conference on Computing in Construction. https://doi.org/10.35490/EC3.2022.226 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Copeland, S., Bilec, M., 2020. Buildings as material banks using RFID and building information modeling in a circular economy. Procedia CIRP 90, 143-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2020.02.122 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hoosain, M.S., Paul, B.S., Raza, S.M., Ramakrishna, S., 2021. Material Passports and Circular Economy. An Introduction to Circular Economy 131-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8510-4_8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ikonen, J., Professor, A., Knutas, A., Hämäläinen, H., Ihonen, M., Porras, J., Kallonen, T., 2013. Use of embedded RFID tags in concrete element supply chains. ITcon Vol. 18, pg. 119-147 18, 119-147.
  7. Klinc, R., Turk, Ž., 2019. Construction 4.0 -Digital Transformation of One of the Oldest Industries. Economic and Business Review 21, 4. https://doi.org/10.15458/ebr. · DOI
  8. Li, C.Z., Xue, F., Li, X., Hong, J., Shen, G.Q., 2018. An Internet of Things-enabled BIM platform for on-site assembly services in prefabricated construction. Autom Constr 89, 146-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2018.01.001 · DOI
  9. McDonough, W., Braungart, M., 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press.
  10. Montaser, A., Moselhi, O., 2014. RFID indoor location identification for construction projects. Autom Constr 39, 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.06.012 · DOI
  11. Motamedi, A., Saini, R., Hammad, A., Zhu, B., 2011. Role-based access to facilities lifecycle information on RFID tags. Advanced Engineering Informatics 25, 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEI.2011.03.004 · DOI
  12. Motamedi, A., Soltani, M.M., Setayeshgar, S., Hammad, A., 2016. Extending IFC to incorporate information of RFID tags attached to building elements. Advanced Engineering Informatics 30, 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEI.2015.11.004 · DOI
  13. Seyis, S., Sönmez, A.M., 2022. Analysis of the benefits, challenges and risks for the integrated use of BIM, RFID and WSN: a mixed method research. Construction Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI- 04-2021-0078/FULL/PDF · DOI
  14. Tang, S., Shelden, D.R., Eastman, C.M., Pishdad- Bozorgi, P., Gao, X., 2019. A review of building information modeling (BIM) and the internet of things (IoT) devices integration: Present status and future trends. Autom Constr 101, 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2019.01.020 · DOI
  15. Turk, Ž., 2016. Ten questions concerning building information modelling. Build Environ 107, 274-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.001 · DOI
  16. van Eijk, F., Turtoi, A., Moustafa, A., Hamada, K., Leffers, J., Oberhuber, S., Cutaia, L., Altamura, P., Cellurale, M., Lemaitre, C., Pitzal, S., Duran, C., Sanchez, G., Bertino, G., Kisser, J., Campanella, D., Ritschkoff, A.-C., 2021. Circular buildings and infrastructure - State of play report. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19196.41609 · DOI
  17. Xu, G., Li, M., Chen, C.H., Wei, Y., 2018. Cloud asset- enabled integrated IoT platform for lean prefabricated construction. Autom Constr 93, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2018.05.012 · DOI
  18. Xue, F., Chen, K., Lu, W., Niu, Y., Huang, G.Q., 2018. Linking radio-frequency identification to Building Information Modeling: Status quo, development trajectory and guidelines for practitioners. Autom Constr 93, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2018.05.023 · DOI
  19. Zhong, R.Y., Peng, Y., Xue, F., Fang, J., Zou, W., Luo, H., Thomas Ng, S., Lu, W., Shen, G.Q.P., Huang, G.Q., 2017. Prefabricated construction enabled by the Internet-of-Things. Autom Constr 76, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2017.01.006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Dervishaj, A., Hernández Vargas, J., & Gudmundsson, K.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Dervishaj, Arlind
Venue
Computing in Construction
Published
2023-07-10
Volume
4
ISSN
2684-1150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383681998
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
8.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computing in construction (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (HORIZON2020, 958200)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
precast concrete, digital twin, circular economy, QR codes, NFC, building information modeling, deconstruction, design for reuse, information integration, circular construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review