Cited by 5Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityAgricultural and Biological ResearchMedicinal Plant Research

Uji Antibakteri Ekstrak Kulit Buah Pisang Kepok (Musa paradisiaca x balbisiana) Mentah Terhadap Pertumbuhan Bakteri Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Pratama, Herdimas Yudha, Ernawati, E., Mahmud, Nur R. Adawiyah·2018·Sainsmat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui aktivitas ekstrak kulit buah mentah pisang kepok (Musa paradisiaca x balbisiana) sebagai antibakteri alami dalam menghambat pertumbuhan bakteri Staphylococcus aureus, dan mengetahui konsentrasi ekstrak kulit buah mentah pisang kepok (Musa paradisiaca x balbisiana) yang paling baik dalam menghambat pertumbuhan bakteri Staphylococcus aureus. Eksperimen terdiri dari 5 perlakuan dan 3 kali ulangan yaitu kontrol perlakuan, perlakuan 1 (P1) = Konsentrasi 25% (0,5 mg/2ml aquades), P2= Konsentrasi 50% (1 mg/2 ml aquades), P3= Konsentrasi 75% (1,5 mg/2 ml aquades), P4=100% (2 mg/2 ml aquades). Parameter yang diukur dalam penelitian ini adalah jumlah koloni bakteri Staphylococcus aureus. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan Standar Plate Count (SPC). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ekstrak kulit buah pisang kepok mentah mampu menghambat pertumbuhan bakteri Staphylococcus aureus. Perlakuan dengan konsentrasi 100% merupakan perlakuan paling baik dalam menghambat pertumbuhan bakteri Staphylococcus aureus dengan jumlah koloni terendah yaitu 8,7 x 104 koloni.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35580/sainsmat7273672018

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Sabir, A. 2003. Pemanfaatan Flavonoid Di Bidang Kedokteran Gigi. Dental Jurnal. 36 (1): 81-87.
  2. Sari, Yeni Dianiat, Siti Nur Djannah, Laea Hayu Nurani. 2010. Uji Aktivitas Antibakteri Infusa Daun Sirsak (Annona Muricata L.) Secara In Vitro Terhadap staphylococcus aureus Atcc 25923 dan escherichia coli Atcc 35218 Serta Profil Kromatografi Lapis Tipisnya. Kes Mas, 4 (3): 144-239.
  3. Wardini, ladisia agata, dan Siti Sulandjari. 2017. Pengaruh Penambahan Tepung Kulit Pisang Kepok dan Kulit Jeruk Nipis Terhadap Hasil Lulur Tradisional. e-Journal, 6 (1): 73-80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pratama, H. Y., Ernawati, E., & Mahmud, N. R. A.
Affiliations
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kupang (ID)
Venue
Sainsmat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam
Published
2018-09-20
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
147
ISSN
  • 2086-6755 (ISSN-L)
  • 2579-5686
OpenAlex
W2901155830
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
id
Open access
Locations
  • Sainsmat Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
antibacterial activity, Staphylococcus aureus, natural antibacterial agents, bacterial growth inhibition, extract concentration, colony count

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review