Cited by 12Education in Rural ContextsIndigenous and Place-Based EducationRural development and sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Challenges and Sustainability Practices of Frontier Schools in Montana

Open access
Morton, Claudette, Harmon, Hobart L.·2018·The Rural Educator

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a study commissioned by the Montana Small Schools Alliance to explore the challenges and sustainability practices of frontier schools. A Montana frontier school is defined as a school district with 200 or fewer students with its attendant community located in a county with five or fewer people per square mile. The researchers surveyed teachers, administrators, and school board chairs in 141 frontier school districts and held six focus groups of community members. The top five most important challenges noted by school district personnel were low student enrollment, inadequate financial resources, unrealistic federal expectations, academically unmotivated students, and mixed grade levels of students in the classroom. School sustainability practices included operating mixed-age or multi-grade classrooms and using school facilities to serve critical community functions. Lay citizens, compared to persons employed by the school district, were more likely to view the school as necessary for maintaining a way of life associated with agriculture and related enterprises. Twelve research questions are offered for future research on issues of frontier schools.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35608/ruraled.v33i1.418

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Gaither, M. (2003). American educational history revisited. New York: Teachers College Press.
  2. Gjelten, T. (1982). Staples, Minnesota: Improving the schools to save the town. In P. Nachtigal (Ed.), Rural education: In search of a better way (pp. 247-265). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  3. Harmon, H.L. (2003). Rural education. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 2083-2090). NY: Macmillan Reference.
  4. Kliewer, L. (March, 2001). Small, rural schools face uncertain future due to predictions of declining enrollment. Firstline Midwest, 3(3), 4. Lombard, IL: Midwestern Office of the Council of State Governments. Retrieved May 9, 2011 from http://www.csg.org/knowledgecenter/docs/flmw-0103.pdf
  5. Scafft, K. A., & Harmon, H. L. (2010). Schools and community development. In J. W. Robinson, Jr., & G. P. Green (Eds.). Introduction to community development: Theory, practice, and service learning (pp. 245-259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Morton, C., & Harmon, H. L.
Venue
The Rural Educator
Published
2018-11-20
Volume
33
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0273-446X (ISSN-L)
  • 2643-9662
OpenAlex
W2109755840
Cited by
11
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The rural educator (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Rural development and sustainability
Keywords
rural school districts, small school districts, school finance, federal education policy, student motivation, multigrade classrooms, mixed-age classrooms, school-community partnership, agricultural communities, Montana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review