CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Library Science and Information LiteracyE-Learning and COVID-19Web and Library Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF MICROLEARNING FOR INFORMATION LITERACY INSTRUCTION IN ACADEMIC LIBRARIES

Open access
Mohd Sapri, Nur Areena Aqilah, Mohd Ridwan, Noor Syakinah, Mahmood, Mahadi, Zanol Rashid, Asma Nadia·2026·International Journal of Modern Education
DOI 10.35631/ijmoe.831081
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

With digital learning and the changing needs of students, information literacy instruction in academic libraries has evolved. Microlearning is consists of short and targeted learning units to support this development. This narrative review covers the characteristics, applications, benefits, shortcomings and future directions of microlearning for information literacy instruction. A broad and iterative search of scholarly literature was undertaken to identify relevant studies, which were then synthesised to identify common themes and research gaps. The findings suggest that microlearning facilitates flexible and learner-centred instruction and is especially valuable for specific, task-oriented Informa literacy skills. But its effectiveness depends on proper instructional design and not just on brevity or technical quality. The major challenges are fragmented learning, instructional continuity, sustainability and limited application of learning theories. Current research also relies heavily on learner perceptions and offers little evidence of actual learning outcomes. Microlearning should therefore supplement rather than replace comprehensive information literacy instruction. Future research should also strengthen the evaluation of the learning outcomes and application of instructional design theories.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35631/ijmoe.831081

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Allen, L. K., DeLiema, D., & Kendeou, P. (2025). A multidimensional framework for student searching in algorithmically curated information environments. Educational Psychologist, 61(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2025.2588213 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2025.2588213 · DOI
  2. Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2024). Enhancing postgraduate students’ learning outcomes through flipped mobile-based microlearning. Research in Learning Technology, 32. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v32.3110 DOI: 10.25304/rlt.v32.3110 · DOI
  3. Bernard, S. (2024). Investigating curriculum integrated information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(1), 102839–102839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102839 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102839 · DOI
  4. Caballero-Mariscal, D., Pinto, M., & Segura, A. (2024). Creación, Evaluación e implementación de la aplicación para la educación superior MoILCaps. Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, (86), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2023.1015 DOI: 10.5195/biblios.2023.1015 · DOI
  5. Chaudhuri, J., & Terrones, L. (2024). Reshaping academic library information literacy programs in the advent of ChatGPT and other generative AI technologies. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 29(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2400132 DOI: 10.1080/10875301.2024.2400132 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chyne, R. C., Khongtim, J., & Wann, T. (2023). Evaluation of social media information among college students: An information literacy approach using CCOW. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(5), 102771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102771 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102771 · DOI
  7. Díaz Redondo, R. P., Caeiro Rodríguez, M., López Escobar, J. J., & Fernández Vilas, A. (2020). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(2), 3121–3151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09523-z DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-09523-z · DOI
  8. Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., & Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in storybooks: A comparison of storybooks that represent ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207 217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000185. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000185 · DOI
  9. Herzberg, M. (2025). Flexible by design: A framework-based approach to redesigning library tutorials for equity and engagement. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 29(4), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2025.2538229 DOI: 10.1080/10875301.2025.2538229 · DOI
  10. Hostetler, K., & Luo, T. (2021). Managing cognitive load in information literacy instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09962-x DOI: 10.1007/s11423-021-09962-x · DOI
  11. Hostetler, K., & Luo, T. (2022). Understanding academic librarians” one-shot instructional design process via a Delphi study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102501 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102501 · DOI
  12. Humrickhouse, E. (2021). Flipped classroom pedagogy in an online learning environment: A self-regulated introduction to information literacy threshold concepts. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(2), 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102327 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102327 · DOI
  13. Idleman, B. J. (2022). Cast a wider net: Leveraging Canvas for asynchronous information literacy learning. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 29(1–2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2022.2089937 DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2022.2089937 · DOI
  14. Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2). 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406 DOI: 10.1177/0002764219869406 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kohnke, L., & Zou, Di. (2026). From pedagogy to practice: Using microlearning to prepare teachers for GenAI and digital multimodal composition. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70156 DOI: 10.1002/tesq.70156 · DOI
  16. Krier, L. (2021). Library curriculum outside the classroom: Connecting library services to student learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(2), 102303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102303 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102303 · DOI
  17. Lee, Y.-M. (2021). Mobile microlearning: A systematic literature review and its implications. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1977964 DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1977964 · DOI
  18. Martzoukou, K. (2020). Academic libraries in COVID-19: A renewed mission for digital literacy. Library Management, 42(45), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-09-2020-0131 DOI: 10.1108/LM-09-2020-0131 · DOI
  19. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007 DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007 · DOI
  20. Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., & Apong, R. A. (2024). Microlearning beyond boundaries: A systematic review and a novel framework for improving learning outcomes. Heliyon, 11(2), e41413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41413 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41413 · DOI
  21. Mullins, K., & Boyd-Byrnes, M. K. (2024). Academic librarians’ contribution to information literacy instruction and learning. College & Research Libraries, 8(3), 423. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.3.423 DOI: 10.5860/crl.85.3.423 · DOI
  22. Nurul Fitriah Alias, & Rafiza Abdul Razak. (2024). Revolutionizing learning in the digital age: A systematic literature review of microlearning strategies. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2331638 DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2024.2331638 · DOI
  23. Olsen, R., & Harlow, S. (2022). Creating library tutorials to provide flexibility and customized learning in asynchronous settings. Public Services Quarterly, 18(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2021.1896413 DOI: 10.1080/15228959.2021.1896413 · DOI
  24. Park, E. E. (2022). Expanding reference through cognitive theory of multimedia learning videos. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(3), 102522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102522 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102522 · DOI
  25. Peacock, R. (2025). Barriers to online library instruction in academic libraries: A qualitative study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(2), 103021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103021 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103021 · DOI
  26. Pho, A., Abumeeiz, S., Bisbee, K., Mody, N., Romero, R., Tranfield, W., & Worsham, D. (2022). You only get one shot: Critically exploring and reimagining the one-shot instruction model. College & Research Libraries, 83(5), 726. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.5.726 DOI: 10.5860/crl.83.5.726 · DOI
  27. Pickard, E., & Sterling, S. (2022). Information literacy instruction in asynchronous online courses: Which approaches work best? College & Research Libraries, 83(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.2.184 DOI: 10.5860/crl.83.2.184 · DOI
  28. Reed, C., Aria, P., Guinsly Mondésir, & Long, H. (2025). Ongoing changes in virtual reference and online instruction in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 86(2), 294. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.86.2.294 DOI: 10.5860/crl.86.2.294 · DOI
  29. Svensson, T., Wilk, J., & Gustafsson Åman, K. (2022). Information literacy skills and learning gaps– students” experiences and teachers” perceptions in interdisciplinary environmental science. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(1), 102465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102465 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102465 · DOI
  30. Tachie-Donkor, G., & Ezema, I. J. (2023). Effect of information literacy skills on university students’ information seeking behaviour and lifelong learning. Heliyon, 9(8), e18427–e18427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18427 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18427 · DOI
  31. Thillainadesan, J., Le Couteur, D. G., Haq, I., & Wilkinson, T. J. (2022). When I say … microlearning. Medical Education, 56(8), 791–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14848 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14848 · DOI
  32. Tomaszewski, R. (2021). A STEM e-class in action: A case study for asynchronous one-shot library instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102414 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102414 · DOI
  33. Tsang, A. L. Y., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2022). Effectiveness of virtual reference services in academic libraries: A qualitative study based on the 5E learning model. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(4), 102533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102533 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102533 · DOI
  34. Wegener, D. R. (2022). Information literacy: Making asynchronous learning more effective with best practices that include humor. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(1), 102482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102482 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102482 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Mohd Sapri, N. A. A., Mohd Ridwan, N. S., Mahmood, M., & Zanol Rashid, A. N.
Affiliations
  • UiTM Kedah, Malaysia
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY)
Venue
International Journal of Modern Education
Publisher
Global Academic Excellence (M) Sdn Bhd
Published
2026-09-24
Volume
8
Issue
31
Pages
1410
ISSN
2637-0905 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.35631/ijmoe.831081
OpenAlex
W7223559848
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Journal of Modern Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universiti Teknologi MARA
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
Keywords
microlearning, information literacy instruction, academic libraries, instructional design, student-centered learning, fragmented learning, learning outcomes, online learning, library instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review