Cited by 7Conflict of Laws and JurisdictionMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationInternational Law and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

‘Legal Identity for All’ and Statelessness: Opportunity and Threat at the Junction of Public and Private International Law

Open access
Manby, Bronwen·2020·Statelessness & Citizenship Review

Abstract

This article considers the impact of Target 16.9 of the Sustainable Development Goals (‘SDGs’), ‘to provide legal identity for all, including birth registration’ on the objective of eradicating statelessness. This SDG Target has given a significant boost to initiatives for the strengthening of civil registration and identification systems, supported by the United Nations and World Bank. Yet its impact on the resolution of statelessness is not clear, because of the immense complexity of the definition of ‘legal identity’. Proposed definitions, adopted after the target was established, fail to take on board the challenges involved in cross-border recognition of civil status documents and the determination of nationality of a child for parents who hold no documents. The article concludes that SDG Target 16.9 is both an opportunity and a threat. If the objective of providing universal ‘legal identity’ is to have a positive impact for stateless persons there is a need for new engagement with the regulation of civil status in private international law, and new insistence in public international law on legal frameworks that facilitate recognition and registration of the different elements of a person’s identity, including nationality, even and especially where they are officially in doubt. Short cuts in this process risk long delays.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35715/scr2002.113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Civil registration is critical to legal status, especially for rights based on family connections, in both countries where nationality is attributed based on birth in the territory and those where legally recognised descent from a citizen is the rule.

    “Civil registration is critical to legal status, especially for rights based on family connections: this applies both in countries where nationality is attributed based on birth in the territory, and in those where legally recognised descent from a citizen (or a person resident in the country at a certain date) is the rule (Manby, 2020).”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 7

Metadata

Authors
Manby, B.
Affiliations
European University Institute (IT)
Corresponding author
Manby, Bronwen
Venue
Statelessness & Citizenship Review
Published
2020-12
Pages
248-271
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133095479
Cited by
7
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • UNICEF
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
Keywords
legal identity, statelessness, birth registration, nationality determination, private international law, public international law, United Nations, World Bank

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review