The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Sinergia colaborativa en aulas inclusivas: una experiencia de grupos interactivos con alumnado con discapacidad intelectual
Open accessAbstract
El presente artículo tiene por objetivo describir y analizar el proyecto Aulas Inclusivas, una experiencia de colaboración sinérgica entre el profesorado que imparte docencia a alumnado con discapacidad intelectual y el personal voluntario que participa en las asociaciones de la Federación Síndrome de Down en Castilla-La Mancha. El proyecto se fundamenta en las comunidades de aprendizaje vehiculado mediante grupos interactivos en siete centros educativos ordinarios, tanto públicos como concertados, distribuidos por las provincias del territorio castellano manchego. Con una metodología cualitativa, se han utilizado dos tipos de técnicas para la extracción de datos: una rúbrica con 15 indicadores de medida a través de la observación participante y una serie de entrevistas grupales a 52 personas participantes en el proyecto. Los resultados muestran los beneficios generados por los grupos interactivos para todo el alumnado, especialmente para el alumnado con síndrome de Down, que han incrementado sus interacciones, han mejorado la gestión emocional y sus habilidades sociales, comunicativas y curriculares. Asimismo, la participación del voluntariado de las asociaciones dentro del aula ha fortalecido los vínculos con el profesorado, lo que ha mejorado la calidad de la enseñanza.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Simón Medina, N., Abellán López, M. A., & Cisneros De Britto, J.
- Venue
- Revista de Investigación en Educación
- Publisher
- University of Vigo
- Published
- 2022-10-31
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-108
- ISSN
- 1697-5200 (ISSN-L)
- 2172-3427
- OpenAlex
- W4308110992
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Revista de Investigación en Educación (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- RUIdeRA - Institutional University Repository (University of Castilla-La Mancha) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Keywords
- inclusive education, intellectual disability, Down syndrome, interactive groups, volunteer associations, learning communities, emotional management, social skills, communication skills, teaching quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review