The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Persoalan Otentitas Hadis Perspektif Ignaz Golziher
Open accessAbstract
The hadith is manifested on form real in life, word, behaviours and attitude of the Prophet towards all things, sometimes its own law that is not found in the Qur’an. The existence of hadith which a central among Muslims became targets for Islam’s enemies (including orientalists) to undermine its guidelines. The Study and research of the hadith continues to be done as basis for doubting the validity of the of the hadith’s, Goldziher as one of the oriental figures who did conducted a study of hadith by continously storming the validity of the hadith with doubting authenticity of the prophet’s hadith
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Textual criticism in the modern period is also a subject of study that became part of the Orientalist discourse, espoused especially by leaders such as Ignaz Goldziher, Joseph Schacht, and G.H.A. Juynboll (d.2010).”
From Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as Syarifuddin and Zaiful Rosyid, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Syarifuddin & Zaiful Rosyid (2019) and al-Munawar (2020) asserted that Western researchers have insisted that early Muslim critics concentrated on isnād rather than matn analysis.”
From Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as Syarifuddin & Zaiful Rosyid, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches
Razak, N. M. A. M., Nazri, M. A., Majid, L. A., Amran, N. N., & Ibrahim, N. S. (2025) · Global Journal Al-Thaqafah · doi:10.7187/gjatsi122025-2 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Syarifuddin, S., & Rosyid, M. Z.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Islam Negeri Madura (ID)
- Venue
- Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan
- Publisher
- Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Qur an Amuntai
- Published
- 2019-12-27
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193
- ISSN
- 1907-4174 (ISSN-L)
- 2621-0681
- OpenAlex
- W2999454539
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Al Qalam Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
- Keywords
- hadith authenticity, Ignaz Goldziher, hadith criticism, Orientalism, Quranic law, Prophet Muhammad, hadith studies, Islamic apologetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
