The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Condition Monitoring of Bearing Damage in Electromechanical Drive Systems by Using Motor Current Signals of Electric Motors: A Benchmark Data Set for Data-Driven Classification
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a benchmark data set for condition monitoring of rolling bearings in combination with an extensive description of the corresponding bearing damage, the data set generation by experiments and results of data-driven classifications used as a diagnostic method. The diagnostic method uses the motor current signal of an electromechanical drive system for bearing diagnostic. The advantage of this approach in general is that no additional sensors are required, as current measurements can be performed in existing frequency inverters. This will help to reduce the cost of future condition monitoring systems. A particular novelty of the present approach is the monitoring of damage in external bearings which are installed in the drive system but outside the electric motor. Nevertheless, the motor current signal is used as input for the detection of the damage. Moreover, a wide distribution of bearing damage is considered for the benchmark data set. The results of the classifications show that the motor current signal can be used to identify and classify bearing damage within the drive system. However, the classification accuracy is still low compared to classifications based on vibration signals. Further, dependency on properties of those bearing damage that were used for the generation of training data are observed, because training with data of artificially generated and real bearing damages lead to different accuracies. Altogether a verified and systematically generated data set is presented and published online for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrasting
Eldele, E., Ragab, M., Chen, Z., Wu, M., Kwoh, C. K., Li, X., & Guan, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/324 · Cited by 696
Wang, H., Liu, Z., Peng, D., & Zuo, M. J. (2023) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110314 · Cited by 270
Self-Supervised Contrastive Representation Learning for Semi-Supervised Time-Series Classification
Eldele, E., Ragab, M., Chen, Z., Wu, M., Kwoh, C.-K., Li, X., & Guan, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3308189 · Cited by 224
Task-sequencing meta learning for intelligent few-shot fault diagnosis with limited data
Hu, Y., Liu, R., Li, X., Chen, D., & Hu, Q. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3112504 · Cited by 180
ACDIN: Bridging the gap between artificial and real bearing damages for bearing fault diagnosis
Chen, Y., Peng, G., Xie, C., Zhang, W., Li, C., & Liu, S. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.03.014 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Lessmeier, C., Kimotho, J. K., Zimmer, D., & Sextro, W.
- Venue
- PHM Society European Conference
- Publisher
- PHM Society
- Published
- 2016-07-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2325-016X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2530133016
- Cited by
- 1,268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Condition Monitoring of Bearing Damage in Electromechanical Drive Systems by Using Motor Current Signals of Electric Motors: A Benchmark Data Set for Data-Driven Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.36001/phme.2016.v3i1.1577
- The paper
- Lessmeier, C., Kimotho, J. K., Zimmer, D., & Sextro, W. (2016). Condition Monitoring of Bearing Damage in Electromechanical Drive Systems by Using Motor Current Signals of Electric Motors: A Benchmark Data Set for Data-Driven Classification. PHM Society European Conference. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2016.v3i1.1577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.