PreprintCited by 68Smart Agriculture and AIMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multi-Modal LLMs in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1109/tase.2025.3612154

Abstract

Given the rapid emergence and applications of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various scientific fields, insights regarding their applicability in agriculture are still only partially explored. This paper conducts an in-depth review of LLMs in agriculture, focusing on understanding how LLMs can be developed and implemented to optimize agricultural processes, increase efficiency, and reduce costs. Recent studies have explored the capabilities of LLMs in agricultural information processing and decision-making. Nevertheless, a comprehensive understanding of the capabilities, challenges, limitations, and future directions of LLMs in agricultural information processing and application remains in its early stages. Such exploration is essential to provide the community with a broader perspective and clearer understanding of LLMs' applications, serving as a baseline for the current state and trends in the subject matter. To bridge this gap, this survey reviews the progress of LLMs and their utilization in agriculture, with an additional focus on 11 key research questions (RQs), where 4 RQs are general and 7 RQs are agriculture focused. By addressing these RQs, this review outlines the current opportunities and challenges, limitations, and future roadmap for LLMs in agriculture. The findings indicate that multi-modal LLMs not only simplify complex agricultural challenges but also significantly enhance decision-making and improve the efficiency of agricultural image processing. These advancements position LLMs as an essential tool for the future of farming. For continued research and understanding, an organized and regularly updated list of papers on LLMs is available at https://github.com/JiajiaLi04/ Multi-Modal-LLMs-in-Agriculture.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36227/techrxiv.172651082.24507804/v1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sapkota, R., Qureshi, R., Hassan, S. Z., Shutske, J., Shoman, M., Sajjad, M., Dharejo, F. A., Paudel, A., Li, J., Meng, Z., Sadak, F., Hadi, M. U., & Karkee, M.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
  • Bartin University (TR)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
Published
2024-09-16
Volume
22
Pages
22510-22540
ISSN
1545-5955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414348472
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4
FWCI
34.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
multimodal large language models, agricultural decision-making, agricultural image processing, training data quality, agricultural automation, future of agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review