The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SMILE: Siamese Multi-scale Interactive-representation LEarning for Hierarchical Diffeomorphic Deformable Image Registration
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102322 · Paper page
Abstract
Deformable medical image registration plays an important role in many clinical applications. It aims to find a dense deformation field to establish point-wise correspondences between a pair of fixed and moving images. Recently, unsupervised deep learning-based registration methods have drawn more and more attention because of fast inference at testing stage. Despite remarkable progress, existing deep learning-based methods suffer from several limitations including: a) they often overlook the explicit modeling of feature correspondence due to limited receptive fields; b) the performance on image pairs with large spatial displacements is still limited since the dense deformation field is regressed from features learned by local convolutions; and c) desirable properties, including topology-preservation and the invertibility of transformation, are often ignored. To address above limitations, we propose a novel network consisting of Siamese Multi-scale Interactive-representation LEarning (SMILE) encoder and Hierarchical Diffeomorphic Deformation (HDD) decoder. Specifically, the SMILE encoder aims for effective feature representation learning and spatial correspondence establishing while the HDD decoder seeks to regress the dense deformation field in a coarse-to-fine manner. We additionally propose a novel Local Invertible Loss (LIL) to encourage topology-preservation and local invertibility of the regressed transformations while keep high registration accuracy. Extensive experiments conducted on two publicly available datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method over the state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quicksilver: Fast predictive image registration – A deep learning approach
Yang, X., Kwitt, R., Styner, M., & Niethammer, M. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.008 · Cited by 630
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, X., & Zheng, G.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- ORCID
- Gao, Xiaoru
- Venue
- Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
- Published
- 2023-08-23
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 102322-102322
- ISSN
- 0730-4862 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390278351
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A20199)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- deformable image registration, diffeomorphic registration, Siamese encoder, multi-scale features, topology preservation, brain MRI registration
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Brain, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review