The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continual Egocentric Activity Recognition via Foreseeable-Generalized Multi-Modal Representations
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1109/jsen.2024.3371975 · Paper page
Abstract
The rapid development of wearable sensors promotes convenient data collection in human daily life. Human Activity Recognition (HAR), as a prominent research direction for wearable applications, has made remarkable progress in recent years. However, existing efforts mostly focus on improving recognition accuracy, paying limited attention to the model’s functional scalability, specifically its ability for continual learning. This limitation greatly restricts its application in open-world scenarios. Moreover, due to storage and privacy concerns, it is often impractical to retain the activity data of different users for subsequent tasks, especially egocentric visual information. Furthermore, the imbalance between visual-based and inertial-measurement-unit (IMU) sensing modality introduces challenges of lack of generalization when employing conventional continual learning techniques. In this paper, we propose a motivational learning scheme to address the limited generalization caused by the modal imbalance, enabling foreseeable generalization in a visual-IMU multimodal network. To overcome forgetting, we introduce a robust representation estimation technique and a pseudo-representation generation strategy for continual learning. Experimental results on the egocentric multimodal activity dataset UESTC-MMEA-CL demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method. Furthermore, our method effectively leverages the generalization capabilities of IMU-based modal representations, outperforming general and state-of-the-art continual learning methods in various task settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition
Ordóñez, F., & Roggen, D. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16010115 · Cited by 2,761
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- He, C., Cheng, S., Qiu, Z., Xu, L., Meng, F., Wu, Q., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Sensors Journal
- Published
- 2023-09-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 12934-12945
- ISSN
- 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392567293
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62271119, 61971095, 62071086)
- Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2023NSFSC1972)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021ZD0112001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Keywords
- continual learning, human activity recognition, wearable sensors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review