Cited by 1Mental Health via WritingPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchEmbodied and Extended Cognition

The role of embodied cognition in linguistic mental health analysis

Open access
David Kernot, M. Van Hooff, E. Lawrence-Wood, L. Glenny, C. Snowden, K. Green, C. Son·2021·MODSIM2021, 24th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.

Abstract

Drawing on the intersection between embodied cognition and the referential process, where the human body and its environment influence the way a person thinks and feels, we compared two linguistic analysis approaches to see if it was possible to classify self-reported mental health in female veterans from their writing using words affected by the emotional and modality-specific systems in the brain.Drawing on self-reported PTSD, Depression, and psychological distress properties in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) we used interview transcripts (n=40) and compared them to normal bloggers' posts (n=25) and discovered statistically significant differences in language use (total of 330,000 words).We used two linguistic approaches, the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) tool, and an embodied cognition approach (Richness, Personal Pronouns, Referential Activity Power, and Sensory (RPAS) algorithm) to statistically correlate findings.In this exploratory study, findings suggested that deployed female military personnel have a distinct pattern of speech which is more blunted (use fewer unique words but more repetition) than women in the community.This style of language is often seen in individuals with anxiety and depression.Deployment length (2-20 months, average = 8.5) directly correlated to increased blunted speech and was related to an increased feeling of emotional numbness and greater un-conscious reliance on memories when generating language.There were also language differences in the female military cohort who self-report more mental health symptoms.Those with self-reported mental health conditions (n=7) used words that focussed on the past and used fewer 'they' type words and isolated themselves to minimise stigma.This stigmatised language implied female military deployees with mental health symptoms felt isolated from their peers, through 'othering' and members of an outgroup.This study supports the idea that linguistic analysis using embodied cognition can discriminate between military females with self-reported mental health and those without and may be a valuable aid in highlighting post-traumatic stress in veterans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36334/modsim.2021.h2.kernot

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kernot et al linked more frequent use of past tense to increased symptom severity.

    “However, Kernot et al 76 provided a contrasting perspective, linking a more frequent use of past tense to increased symptom severity.”

    From Linguistic markers for identifying post-traumatic stress disorder and associated symptoms: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Results report a higher ‘focuspast’ word score among women with high versus low self-reported PTSD scores (8.54 versus 7.28), and the Discussion describes greater use of words focused on the past among women reporting more mental health symptoms. The paper does not specifically report past-tense usage, so that narrower wording is not established by its finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Alorainy, W., Burnap, P., Liu, H. & Williams, M.L. (2019). '"The enemy among us": Detecting cyber hate speech with threats-based othering language embeddings', ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 13(3), pp. 1-26.
  2. Bradbury, R., Bossomaier, T. & Kernot, D. (2017). 'Predicting the emergence of self-radicalisation through social media: A complex systems approach', in M Conway, L Jarvis, O Lehane, S Macdonald & L Nouri (eds.), Terrorists' Use of The Internet, IOS Press, p. 381.
  3. Bucci, W. & Miller, N.E. (1993), 'Primary process analogue: The referential activity (RA) measure', in NE Miller, L Luborsky, JP Barber & JP Docherty (eds.), Psychodynamic Treatment Research: A Handbook for Clinical Practice, Basic Books, New York, pp. 387-406.
  4. Doyle, J. K., & Ford, D. N. (1998). Mental models concepts for system dynamics research. System dynamics review: the journal of the System Dynamics Society, 14(1), 3-29.
  5. Forrester, J. W. (1971). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Theory and decision, 2(2), 109-140.
  6. Forrester, J. W. (1997). Industrial dynamics. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(10), 1037-1041.
  7. Hotton, S., & Yoshimi, J. (2010). The dynamics of embodied cognition. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 20(04), 943-972.
  8. Hotton, S., & Yoshimi, J. (2011). Extending dynamical systems theory to model embodied cognition. Cognitive Science, 35(3), 444-479.
  9. Jaramillo, C.A., Eapen, B.C., McGeary, C.A., McGeary, D.D., Robinson, J., Amuan, M. & Jo Pugh, M. (2016). 'A cohort study examining headaches among veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan wars: Associations with traumatic brain injury, PTSD, and depression', Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 56(3), pp. 528-539.
  10. Kernot, D. (2019). 'An embodied cognition classifier of human emotion', in S. Eldswah (ed.), 23rd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Canberra, ACT. 1-6 December 2019, <http://mssanz.org.au/modsim2019/>.
  11. Meadows, D. L., Behrens, W. W., Meadows, D. H., Naill, R. F., Randers, J., & Zahn, E. (1974). Dynamics of growth in a finite world (p. 637). Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen Press.
  12. Murphy, S.M., Maskit, B. & Bucci, W. (2015), 'Putting feelings into words: Cross-linguistic markers of the referential process', Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality, Denver, Colorado, pp. 80-88, <https://docplayer.net/104210447-Putting- feelings-into-words-cross-linguistic-markers-of-the-referential-process.html>.
  13. Nook, E.C., Schleider, J.L. & Somerville, L.H. (2017). 'A linguistic signature of psychological distancing in emotion regulation', Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(3), p. 337.
  14. Port, R. F., & Van Gelder, T. (Eds.). (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. MIT press.
  15. Schöner, G., & Reimann, H. (2019). Understanding Embodied Cognition through Dynamical System Thinking. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology (pp. 505-528). Routledge.
  16. Smith, L. B. (2005). Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment. Developmental Review, 25(3-4), 278-298.
  17. Tausczik, YR & Pennebaker, JW 2010, 'The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerised text analysis methods', Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), pp. 24-54.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kernot, D., Hooff, M. V., Lawrence-Wood, E., Glenny, L., Snowden, C., Green, K., & Son, C.
Affiliations
  • Defence Science and Technology Group (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
David Kernot
Venue
MODSIM2021, 24th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.
Published
2021-12-16
ISSN
2205-5061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200132634
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MODSIM (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hospital Research Foundation
  • University of Adelaide
  • Defence Science and Technology Group
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
embodied cognition, women veterans, mental health, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, psychological distress, linguistic analysis, emotional numbness, LIWC, stigma, othering, language and emotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review