Improving Inpatient Medication Dispensing with an Automated System
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Medication inventory management and error prevention are complex issues. Single interventions are insufficient to make improvement across the spectrum. A uniform system for dispensing and distributing medications can help reduce the risk of medication errors, improve efficiency, and minimize waste. This quality improvement project aims to: 1) decrease – the time from ordering medication to administration, including delay incidents, by > 70%; and 2) decrease the inpatient monthly total medication consumption by > 20% and ward medication stock items by > 70%, including decreasing returned items and loss from in-house expired medications by > 70%. Methods: A Six-Sigma approach was applied to eliminate deficiencies throughout the medication management process. Failure mode effect analysis and staff surveys were used to evaluate implementation of automated dispensing cabinet (ADCs) and reengineered workflows for expensive, misused, and restricted medications. Results: After the new processes were implemented, the turnaround time from ordering medication to administration was reduced by 83%, with zero delay incidents reported. Most nurses (64%) and pharmacists (67%) stated that implementation of ADCs increased their productivity by more than 40%. Monthly medication consumption was reduced by 24%, with an estimated annual saving of $4,100,000 USD. The number of returned items per month was reduced by 72%, and the estimated annual savings from loss of in-house expired medications was $750,000 USD. Conclusions: This quality improvement project positively impacted stock control while reducing costs and turnaround time for inpatient medication dispensing. Medication delay incidents were reduced, and staff satisfaction levels were positive. Next steps are to reengineer narcotic, anesthesia, and refrigerated products’ management.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Benefits in cost saving were observed from reduced ward stock supply and annual spend on expired medicines, decreased stockouts, and decreased stock orders from central pharmacy.
“Benefits in cost saving were observed from reduced ward stock supply and annual spend on expired medicines, decreased stockouts, and decreased stock orders from central pharmacy [8,9,19,37,38,56,63].”
From Benefits and challenges associated with implementation and ongoing use of automated dispensing cabinet for medicines: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
The Results report an 81% reduction in ward stock and an estimated annual saving of $750,000 from expired medications. The Discussion mentions stock-outs only as an established metric the project did not select; it does not report decreased stock-outs or fewer stock orders from central pharmacy. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- [2]Nagar S Davey N Reducing avoidable time delays in immediate medication administration—learning from a failed intervention BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2015 4 u206468.w2612 PMC4645713 26734316
- [3]Matthews P Wangrangsimakul T Borthwick M et al. Electronic prescribing: reducing delay to first dose of antibiotics for patients in intensive care BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2013 2 u202241.w1120 PMC4663851 26734229
- [4]Coleman J Hodson J Brooks HL Rosser D Missed medication doses in hospitalised patients: a descriptive account of quality improvement measures and time series analysis Int J Qual Health Care 2013 25 564– 572 23744995 PMC3786625
- [5]Ahtiainen H Kallio M Airaksinen M Holmström A Safety, time and cost evaluation of automated and semi-automated drug distribution systems in hospitals: a systematic review Eur J Hosp Pharm 2020 27 253– 262 32839256 PMC7447254
- [6]McCarthy B Ferker M Implementation and optimization of automated dispensing cabinet technology Am J Health Syst Pharm 2016 73 1531– 1536 27646814
- [7]O’Neil D Miller A Cronin D Hatfield C A comparison of automated dispensing cabinet optimization methods Am J Health Syst Pharm 2016 73 975– 980 27217517
- [8]Nanni A Rana T Schenkat D Screening for expired medications in automated dispensing cabinets Am J Health Syst Pharm 2020 77 2107– 2111 33091102
- [10]Wang Y Tsan C Chen M Implementation of an automated dispensing cabinet system and its impact on drug administration: longitudinal study JMIR Form Res 2021 5 e24542 34533467 PMC8486989
- [11]Zaidan M Rustom F Kassem N et al. Nurses’ perceptions of and satisfaction with the use of automated dispensing cabinets at the Heart and Cancer Centers in Qatar: a cross-sectional study BMC Nurs 2016 15 4 26770071 PMC4712505
- [14]Berdot S Blanc C Chevalier D et al. Impact of drug storage systems: a quasi-experimental study with and without an automated-drug dispensing cabinet Int J Qual Health Care 2019 31 225– 230 30020459
- [15]Cottney A Improving the safety and efficiency of nurse medication rounds through the introduction of an automated dispensing cabinet BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2014 3 u204237.w1843 PMC4645698 26734256
- [16]Cheung K Bouvy M De Smet P Medication errors: the importance of safe dispensing Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009 67 676– 680 19594537 PMC2723208
- [17]Cousein E Mareville J Lerooy A et al. Effect of automated drug distribution systems on medication error rates in a short-stay geriatric unit J Eval Clin Pract 2014 20 678– 684 24917185 PMC4524418
- [18]Bonnabry P François O Return on investment: a practical calculation tool to convince your institution Eur J Hosp Pharm 2020 27 111– 113 32133138 PMC7043264
- [19]Prado-Mel E Mejías Trueba M Reyes González I et al. Failure mode effect analysis for safety improvement in the automatic drug dispensing systems [in Spanish] J Healthc Qual Res 2021 36 81– 90 33495116
- [20]Svirsko A Norman B Hostetler S Parry B Optimizing the medication distribution process for inpatient units J Med Syst 2022 46 32 35501418
- [21]Niñerola A Sánchez-Rebull M Hernández-Lara A Quality improvement in healthcare: Six Sigma systematic review Health Policy 2020 124 438– 445 32156468
- [22]DelliFraine J Wang Z McCaughey D et al. The use of six sigma in health care management: are we using it to its full potential? Qual Manag Health Care 2014 23 240– 253 25260101
- [25]Stamatis D Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution Milwaukee, WI ASQC Quality Press 1995
- [26]Cello R Conley M Cooley T et al. ASHP Guidelines on the Safe Use of Automated Dispensing Cabinets Am J Health Syst Pharm 2022 79 e71– e82 34453436
- [27]Tarricone R Callea G Ogorevc M Prevolnik Rupel V Improving the methods for the economic evaluation of medical devices Health Econ 2017 26(suppl 1): 70– 92 28139085
- [28]Craswell A Bennett K Dalgliesh B et al. The impact of automated medicine dispensing units on nursing workflow: a cross-sectional study Int J Nurs Stud 2020 111 103773 33002837
- [31]Al Nemari M Waterson J The introduction of robotics to an outpatient dispensing and medication management process in Saudi Arabia: retrospective review of a pharmacy-led multidisciplinary Six Sigma performance improvement project JMIR Hum Factors 2022 9 e37905 36222805 PMC9597422
- [32]Momattin H Arafa S Momattin S et al. Robotic pharmacy implementation and outcomes in Saudi Arabia: a 21-month usability study JMIR Hum Factors 2021 8 e28381 34304149 PMC8444036
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jung, Y. Y., Walsh, Á., Patel, J., & Lai, K. (2025) · Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100599 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Almalki, A., Jambi, A., Elbehiry, B., & Albuti, H.
- Affiliations
- King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Jambi, Aseel
- Venue
- Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare
- Publisher
- Innovative Healthcare Institute
- Published
- 2023-11-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 117-125
- ISSN
- 2589-9449 (ISSN-L)
- 2666-2353
- PMC
- PMC10887473
- OpenAlex
- W4388979571
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- automated dispensing cabinets, drug inventory management, medication errors, medication waste reduction, workflow redesign, Six Sigma, failure mode and effects analysis, staff satisfaction, hospital pharmacy, drug cost savings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review