The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Pharmaceutical Electronic Bidding Procurement on Prices of Medicines: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
An electronic bidding system promises to save resources in procurement procedures for many industries. While the results of previous studies in several countries sounded promising, it is concerning that more evidence would be needed to support changes in practice for the pharmaceutical sector. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of price saving in bidding-based electronic procurement setting and to clarify the main factors contributing to drug price changes. A comprehensive literature search was retrieved from five databases (Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, Medline) to identify articles that studied the prices of medicines as a case study before and after the implementation of the electronic bidding system. Articles that were published in English from January 2012 to December 2021 were eligible for inclusion. The result showed that a total of 3214 records articles were identified in the electronic databases after the exclusion of duplicate articles. After the initial review, we found 13 studies that fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The review presented the important information suggesting that the use of the electronic bidding system likely results in a reduction in procurement prices of medicines. The prevalence of price saving for pharmaceutical procurement ranged from 7.24 % to 40 %. Additionally, the following factors were indirectly associated with drug price changes; bid volume, procurement location, contract characteristics, level of competitiveness and procurement organization. Further research may need to examine the functioning of e-bidding policies to address problems like supply disruptions to preserve the integrity of bidding-based pharmaceutical systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By automating specific steps in pharmaceutical procurement system, e-procurement system reduces the potential for human interference and bias (Pentrakan et al., 2022;Tinali, 2022).”
From Promoting transparency and accountability towards anti-corruption in pharmaceutical procurement system: does e-procurement play a significant role? (2024) · cites this paper as Pentrakan et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
Diepeveen, S., Ling, T., Suhrcke, M., Roland, M., & Marteau, T. M. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-756 · Cited by 656
A Competitive-Bidding Strategy
Friedman, L. (1956) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.4.1.104 · Cited by 522
Miller, S. A., & Forrest, J. L. (2001) · Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice · doi:10.1016/s1532-3382(01)70024-3 · Cited by 339 · cited 1×
“In the study, Population Intervention Comparison Outcomes (PICO) frame work[16] was performed to define a well-formulated question and select the relevant terms; problem (pharmaceutical procurement system), intervention (electronic bidding approach), comparison (there had no specific defined comparison group) and outc…”
MethodUsing PLS-SEM technique to model construction organizations' willingness to participate in e-bidding
Aibinu, A. A., & Al-Lawati, A. M. (2010) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.016 · Cited by 295
Dietary Patterns and Childhood Obesity Risk: A Systematic Review
Liberali, R., Kupek, E. J., & de Assis, M. A. A. (2020) · Childhood Obesity · doi:10.1089/chi.2019.0059 · Cited by 291
Online Reverse Auctions: Issues, Themes, and Prospects for the Future
Jap, S. D. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/009207002236925 · Cited by 267
Reverse auctions––grounded theory from the buyer and supplier perspective
Carter, C. R., Kaufmann, L., Beall, S., Carter, P. L., Hendrick, T. E., & Petersen, K. J. (2003) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2003.08.004 · Cited by 173
Deciding on the Mode of Negotiation: To Auction or Not to Auction Electronically
Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2004) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2004.tb00166.x · Cited by 113
Nguyen, T. A., Knight, R., Roughead, E. E., Brooks, G., & Mant, A. (2014) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czt105 · Cited by 111
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Jaśkowski P, Czarnigowska A. Contractor's bid pricing strategy: A model with correlation among competitors' prices. Open Eng 2019;9(1):159-66. · DOI
- Chuang CH, Tseng PC, Lin CY, Lin KH, Chen YY. Burnout in the intensive care unit professionals: A systematic review. Medicine 2016;95(50):e5629.
- Roy V. A way to low cost, quality medicines: Implementation of an essential medicines policy in public health facilities in Delhi (India). Int J Res Pharm Sci 2013;4(3):397-410.
- San Santoso D, Bourpanus N. Moving to e-bidding: Examining the changes in the bidding process and the bid mark-up decisions of Thai contractors. J Financial Manag Proper Constr 2018;24(1):2-18. · DOI
- Rizzo JA. Advertising and competition in the ethical pharmaceutical industry: The case of antihypertensive drugs. J Law Econ 1999;42(1):89-116. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mahuwi, L., & Israel, B. (2024) · Management Matters · doi:10.1108/manm-07-2023-0027 · Cited by 25
Ayarkwa, J., Atanga, R. A., Osei‐Asibey, D., Abu, I. M., & Osei-Tutu, S. (2025) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-05-2024-0060 · Cited by 12
Pentrakan, A., & Chen, A. L. P. (2023) · The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics · doi:10.55549/epstem.1357602
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pentrakan, A., Han Lin, K., Sriphon, T., Yi Wang, J., & Keung Wong, W.
- Affiliations
- Prince of Songkla University (TH)
- Asia University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Pentrakan, Amarawan
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- S5
- ISSN
- 0250-474X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4318256390
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- electronic bidding, drug procurement, drug prices, discounts, contract characteristics, supply disruption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
