Cited by 0Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInnovations in Medical EducationInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Development and Implementation processes:The exploration of interprofessional education programmes

Open access
Delawala, Farhin, Heymans, Yolande, Christmals, Christmal·2025·The Thinker

Abstract

There have been many calls for Interprofessional Education (IPE) in the last decade. Many authors have attempted to produce guidelines, steps, and processes for developing undergraduate and graduate IPE programmes in health professions education. This scoping review, guided by the enhanced Arksey and O’Malley framework, sought to synthesise the nature, development, and implementation processes of interprofessional education programmes for health professions’ students in higher education institutions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36615/rnx91b37

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Delawala, F., Heymans, Y., & Christmals, C.
Affiliations
  • University of South Africa (ZA)
  • North-West University (ZA)
Venue
The Thinker
Published
2025-08-08
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
38-70
ISSN
  • 2075-2458 (ISSN-L)
  • 2616-907X
OpenAlex
W6966105197
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Thinker (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
interprofessional education, health professions education, health professions students, higher education institutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review