The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting Secukinumab Fast-Responder Profile in Psoriatic Patients: Advanced Application of Artificial-Neural-Networks (ANNs)
Abstract
Background Drug resistance to biologics in psoriasis therapy can occur – it may be acquired during a treatment or else present itself from the beginning. To date, no biomarkers are known that may reliably guide clinicians in predicting responsiveness to biologics. Biologics may pose a substantial economic burden. Secukinumab efficiently targets IL-17 in the treatment of psoriasis. Objective To assess the “fast responder” patient profile, predicting it from the preliminary complete blood count (CBC) and clinical examination. Materials and methods From November 2016 to May 2017 we performed a multicenter prospective open label pilot study in three Italian reference centers enrolling bio-naive plaque psoriasis patients, undergoing the initiation phase secukinumab treatment (300mg subcutaneous at week 0,1,2,3,4). We define fast responders as patients having achieved at least PASI 75 at the end of secukinumab induction phase. Clinical and CBC data at week 0 and at week 4 were analyzed with linear statistics, principal component analysis, and artificial neural networks (ANNs), also known as deep learning. Two different ANNs were employed: Auto Contractive Map (Auto-CM), an unsupervised ANNs, to study how this variables cluster and a supervised ANNs, Training with Input Selection and Testing (TWIST), to build the predictive model. Results We enrolled 23 plaque psoriasis patients: 19 patients were responders and 4 were non-responders. 30 attributes were examined by Auto-CM, creating…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unsupervised artificial neural networks on baseline clinical and blood count data predicted responders to secukinumab in psoriasis.
“Damiani et al (2020) utilized unsupervised artificial neural networks on baseline clinical and blood count data to predict responders to secukinumab”
From Artificial intelligence–enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases (2026) · cites this paper as Damiani et al, 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence–enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases
Tang, A. S., Wei, M. L., Haemel, A., La, C., Sirota, M., & Lee, E. Y. (2026) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2025.10.596 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Damiani, G., Conic, R., Pigatto, P., Carrera, C., Franchi, C., Cattaneo, A., Malagoli, P., Uppala, R., Linder, D., Bragazzi, N., & Grossi, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
- IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio (IT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Drugs in Dermatology
- Publisher
- SanovaWorks
- Published
- 2020-11-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1241-1246
- ISSN
- 1545-9616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3113565159
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Keywords
- secukinumab, psoriasis, IL-17 inhibition, complete blood count, artificial neural networks, Twist, PASI 75, drug resistance, predictive biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Adult, Biological Products, Drug Resistance, Female, Humans, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Psoriasis, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Models, Immunological, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review