Cited by 32Education during COVID-19 pandemicAfrican cultural and philosophical studiesCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Managing the Psycho-Social Vacuum of COVID-19 among Rural Learners through Ubuntu

Open access
Omodan, Bunmi Isaiah·2020·Journal of Educational and Social Research

Abstract

The advent of COVID-19 has thrown the world in upheaval, most notably in the operationalisation of secondary schools. Observation, bodies of existing literature, and experience have shown that rural secondary school learners are disillusioned and uncertain on the future of their academic development amidst the “psycho-social” vagueness regarding their schooling and well-being. This study draws its background from South African teachers’ perspectives and proposed Ubuntu as relational framework lensing through Transformative Paradigm to respond to the problem. Critical Emancipatory Research was adopted as a research design. Five secondary schools located in Thabo Mofutsanyane municipality of the Free State, South Africa, form the research site. Two teachers each were selected from the schools using the opportunistic selection approach. A semi-structured interview was used to collect data from the teachers on the challenges faced in managing learners during the pandemic and how to manage the effect of COVID-19 on the learners. Socio-thematic Analysis (StA) was used to analyse the data. The findings showed that learners in rural areas are disadvantaged through the poverty line, affected psycho-socially, and that the need for sociological and psychological supports for teachers and learners becomes expedient in the management of the vacuum created by COVID-19. The study concluded that the principle of Ubuntu during and after COVID19 is a possible means to ameliorate the vacuum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36941/jesr-2020-0125

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of rural communities in South Africa still have inadequate social amenities such as electricity, schools, health care, potable water, modern markets, and internet connectivity.

    “the majority of rural communities are still wallowing in the illusion of perversity, low level of transformation, low level of civilisation, lack or inadequate social amenities such as electricity, schools and access to health care facilities, potable water, modern market and internet connectivity (Flora et al., 2018; Mfenyana et al., 2006; Omodan, 2020; Sovacool, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omodan, B. I.
Affiliations
University of the Free State (ZA)
Corresponding author
Omodan, Bunmi Isaiah
Venue
Journal of Educational and Social Research
Published
2020-11-18
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
266
ISSN
  • 2239-978X (ISSN-L)
  • 2240-0524
OpenAlex
W3101596565
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Journal of Educational and Social Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › African cultural and philosophical studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, Ubuntu, psychosocial well-being, teacher perceptions, poverty, socioeconomic deprivation, transformative paradigm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review