Innovations in nursing education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review
Open accessAbstract
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has transformed the delivery of nursing education. This scoping review identified innovative improvements or changes in nursing education developed by nursing faculty in response to the COVID-19 pandemic globally. This is a scoping review using Arksey and O’Malley framework, refined by Joanna Briggs Institute. Three electronic databases were searched to identify studies published between December 2019 and December 2021, irrespective of design. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Statement for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of the studies, and multiple reviewers extracted the studies. Two reviewers crosschecked 10% of the extracted data to ensure accuracy and consistency. We grouped and described conceptual categories narratively. Of the 1339 retrieved papers, 111 met eligibility criteria. Most studies were from North America (69; 62.2%) and involved undergraduate nursing students (80; 72.1%). Many studies (61; 55.0%) were letters, commentaries, and editorials that offered short communications on ongoing innovative interventions. Reported nursing education innovations included online or virtual alternatives to face-to-face delivery (68; 61.3%), online or virtual alternatives to clinical placement (39; 35.1%) and faculty development (4; 3.4%). Reported outcomes included students’ satisfaction and intervention experiences. The reported innovations were crucial in mitigating the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic for nursing education. Nurse educators are presented with a unique opportunity to embrace and build on the emerging pedagogies even after the global emergency. Further research must focus on 1) understanding the sustainability and enduring effects of the identified innovations in the post-pandemic period; 2) supporting students and faculty with new learning platforms, and 3) the long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on undergraduate and postgraduate nursing education. TE REO MĀORI TRANSLATION: Ngā auahatanga i te ao mātauranga tapuhi hei urupare ki te Mate Urutā o COVID-19: He Arotake Hōkai: Ngā Ariā Matua Nā te Mate Urutā o COVID-19 i whakaumu te horanga mātauranga tapuhi. Nā tēnei arotake hōkai i tautohu ētahi whakapikinga auaha, panonitanga hoki i roto i te mātauranga tapuhi, o ētahi whare whakaako tapuhi, hei urupare ki te mate urutā COVID-19 huri noa i te ao. He arotake hōkai tēnei i whakamahi i te anga a Arksey rāua ko O’Malley, he mea whakamahine e Joanna Briggs Institute. E toru ngā pātengi raraunga hiko i rapua hei tautohu i ngā pukapuka i whakaputaina i waenga i Tīhema 2019 me Tīhema 2021, ahakoa pēhea te hoahoa. Nā ngā aratohu Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews me Meta-analysis Statement for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) ngā mahi i ārahi, ā, i riro nā ētahi kaiarotake tokorua i aromatawai takitahi te āheinga o te pukapuka, ā, he maha ngā kaiarotake nāna i kounu ngā raraunga. Tokorua ngā kaiarotake i āta titiro i tētahi 10% o ngā raraunga i kounutia, kia mōhio pū ai he tika, he hangarite hoki. I whakarōpūtia, i whakamāramatia hoki e mātou ngā kāwai ariā hei pūrākau. O ngā pepa 1339 i tīkina ake, i tutuki ngā paearu āheinga i ngā mea 111. Ko te nuinga o ngā puka nō Amerika ki te Raki (69; 62.2%) ā, he ākonga tapuhi paetahi ngā mea i roto (80; 72.1%). He tini ngā reta, ngā tākinga kōrero, ngā tuhinga ētita hoki i roto (63; 57.0%) i kitea ai ētahi whakapuaki pono mō ngā whakahoutanga auaha. Ko ētahi o ngā auahtanga mātauranga tapuhi i roto ko ngā ara hou i te ao tuihono, mariko rānei, hei whakakapi mō te horanga mātauranga ā-kanohi (68; 61.3%); ngā ara hou i te ao tuihono, mariko rānei, mō te whakanohonga ki ngā mahi tiaki tūroro (39; 35.1%); me te whakawhanaketanga kura whakaako (4; 3.4%). I kitea i roto i ngā putanga i pūrongotia ko te harikoa ākonga, me ngā wheako whakahoutanga. He mea taketake ngā whakahoutanga i pūrongotia hei whakaheke i ngā wero i ara ake i roto i te mate urutā COVID-19, mō te mātauranga tapuhi. Kua homai tētahi whāinga wāhi taketake ki ngā kaiako tapuhi kia awhi, kia waihanga hoki i ngā akoranga hou, ahakoa i muri i te whawhati nui i pā ki te ao. Me aro nui ētahi atu rangahau ki te 1) māramatanga ki te toitū, me ngā pānga haere tonu o ngā auahatanga i tautohutia i te wā i muri i te mate urutā; 2) te tautoko i ngā ākonga me te kura whakaako ki te hāpai i ngā pūhara ako hou; me 3) ngā pānga wā roa o te mate urutā COVID-19 ki ngā mātauranga tapuhi paetahi, paerua hoki. Ngā kupu matua: COVID-19; auahatanga; mātauranga tapuhi; mate urutā; arotake hōkai; ngā hangarau
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The observed pattern aligns with early technology adoption challenges in nursing education during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The pattern aligns with the observed early technology adoption challenges in nursing education during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic (Amankwaa et al., 2022).”
From Patterns, advances, and gaps in using ChatGPT and similar technologies in nursing education: A PAGER scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as Amankwaa et al., 2022
Cites
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., et al. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0850 · Cited by 43,565 · see citing works
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · Cited by 26,092 · see citing works
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x · Cited by 11,385 · see citing works
The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2024) · Handbook of Research in Online Learning · doi:10.1163/9789004702813_021 · Cited by 6,253 · see citing works
<scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University
Bao, W. (2020) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.191 · Cited by 2,268 · see citing works
Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A., & Khalil, H. (2019) · JBI Reviewer's Manual · doi:10.46658/jbirm-20-01 · Cited by 2,222 · see citing works
Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review
Doraiswamy, S., Abraham, A., Mamtani, R., & Cheema, S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/24087 · Cited by 698 · see citing works
Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review
Jowsey, T., Foster, G., Cooper-Ioelu, P., & Jacobs, S. (2020) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Rapid publications risk the integrity of science in the era of COVID-19.
Bagdasarian, N., Cross, G. B., & Fisher, D. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01650-6 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amankwaa, I., Ekpor, E., Cudjoe, D., Kobiah, E., Fuseini, A.-K. J., Diebieri, M., Gyamfi, S., & Brownie, S. (2025) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106822 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Amankwaa, I., Boateng, D., Quansah, D. Y., Akuoko, C. P., Desu, A. P. B., & Hales, C.
- Affiliations
- Waikato Institute of Technology (NZ)
- Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- Christian Service University College (GH)
- Ghana Health Service (GH)
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Amankwaa, Isaac
- Venue
- Nursing Praxis in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Publisher
- College of Nurses Aotearoa (NZ) Inc
- Published
- 2022-12-22
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0112-7438 (ISSN-L)
- 2703-4542
- OpenAlex
- W4312186764
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nursing Praxis in Aotearoa New Zealand (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Greater South Information System
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, nursing education, educational innovation, online learning, faculty development, undergraduate nursing students, student satisfaction, nursing pedagogy, post-pandemic education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review