Cited by 25Educational Innovations and TechnologyEducational Technology in LearningEducational Innovations and Challenges

Technology and education. Innovation and hindrances

Open access
·2022·Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37074/jalt.2022.5.s1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Historical cycles of educational technology have often promised more than they delivered.

    “Historical cycles of educational technology -from Edison's predictions about motion pictures imminently replacing books (Terzian, 2019) to the envisioned role of radio as a 'Master Teacher' (Cook, 1938), television's educational promises (Terzian, 2019), and the advent and challenges of computers in classrooms (Watters, 2021) have often promised more than they delivered (Kefalaki et al., 2022).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching
Published
2022-02-11
Volume
5
Issue
Special Issue
ISSN
2591-801X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211210290
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
Keywords
educational technology, educational innovation, barriers to innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review