Cited by 466Religion and Society InteractionsReligious Freedom and DiscriminationStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Secularization: An Analysis at Three Levels

Dobbelaere, Karel·2003·Peter Lang B eBooks

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3726/978-3-0352-6146-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobbelaere, K.
Corresponding author
Dobbelaere, Karel
Venue
Peter Lang B eBooks
Publisher
Peter Lang B
Published
2003-01-01
OpenAlex
W575211704
Cited by
466
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 23
FWCI
10.87
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Peter Lang B eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
secularization, levels of analysis, religion and society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review